Wolinski v. Lewis et al

Filing 61

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/3/2020 DENYING 50 Motion for Reconsideration; DENYING 60 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Order. The Magistrate Judge's 10/21/2019, and 1/15/2019, orders areAFFIRMED; and No further Motions for Reconsideration of or Motions to vacate these orders will be considered. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI,

12

No. 2:17-cv-00583-MCE-AC

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

J. LEWIS et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant
17
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are two motions filed by Plaintiff: (1)
18
19
20

Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 50) of the Magistrate Judge’s October 21, 2019,
order denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 48); and (2) Motion to Vacate, Set
Aside, or Correct (ECF No. 60) the Magistrate Judge’s January 15, 2019, order granting

21
Defendants’ Motion for Sanctions (ECF No. 36).
22
23
24

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge’s
order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the
entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge’s rulings were

25
clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
27

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 50) is DENIED;

28
1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Order (ECF No. 60) is
DENIED;
3. The Magistrate Judge’s October 21, 2019, and January 15, 2019, orders are
AFFIRMED; and
4. No further motions for reconsideration of or motions to vacate these orders will
be considered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 3, 2020

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2