Wolinski v. Lewis et al

Filing 81

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/26/2023 DENYING plaintiff's 79 motion for an extension of time as moot. Within 30 days, defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's 69 second amended complaint. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KRZYSZTOF F. WOLINSKI,

12

No. 2:17-cv-0583 MCE AC P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

J. LEWIS, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner pursuing a civil rights action, has filed a motion for a thirty-day

17
18

extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations related to screening of

19

the second amended complaint (“SAC”). ECF No. 79. A previous motion to extend the

20

objections deadline, ECF No. 76, was denied. The district judge subsequently adopted the

21

findings and recommendations. ECF No. 78. The request for an extension of time is therefore

22

moot.
Because the SAC has been screened and certain claims and defendants have been

23
24

dismissed (see ECF Nos. 75, 78), the remaining defendants will be directed to respond.

25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

26

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 79), is DENIED as moot; and

27

////

28

////
1

1

2. Within thirty days of the date of this order, defendants shall file a response to

2

plaintiff’s second amended complaint.

3

DATED: September 26, 2023

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2