Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/7/2017 ORDERING plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is EXTENDED to 11/27/2017. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 JESSE S. KAPLAN CSB#103726 5441 Fair Oaks Bl. Ste. C-1 Carmichael, CA 95608 916/488-3030 916/489-9297 fax Attorney for Plaintiff SHERRIE THOMPSON 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 -o0O0o- 11 12 13 SHERRIE THOMPSON, No. 2:17-CV-00584-CKD 14 Plaintiff, 15 STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 17 18 19 20 21 v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _______________________________________/ 22 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective 23 undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court, that plaintiff’s time to file a motion 24 25 for summary judgment is extended to November 27, 2017. This is a first extension requested because plaintiff’s counsel has multiple briefs due at 26 27 essentially the same time, in addition to his other work. 28 [Pleading Title] - 1 1 2 3 Dated: November 2, 2017 /s/ Jesse S. Kaplan JESSE S. KAPLAN Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 6 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 7 8 9 10 Dated: November 2, 2017 /s/ per e-mail authorization 11 DANIEL TALBERT Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Defendant 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 17 18 For good cause shown on the basis of this stipulation, the requested extension of 19 20 21 plaintiff’s time to file a motion for summary judgment brief is extended to November 27, 2017. SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 Dated: November 7, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28 [Pleading Title] - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?