Zamora et al v. Bayer Corp. et al

Filing 17

ORDER DECLINING to Relate Cases 1:16-cv-01075-DAD-EPG and 2:17-cv-00587-WBS-AC signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/17/2017. (Jessen, A)

Defendants.
16
17
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

DENA M. MILLS, et al.,

13
14
15

No. 1:16-cv-01075-DAD-EPG

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER DECLINING TO RELATE CASES

BAYER CORP., et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

MARGIE ZAMORA, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

19
20
21
22

No. 2:17-cv-00587-WBS-AC

v.
BAYER CORP., et al.,
Defendants.

23
24

On March 23, 2017 and March 25, 2017, defendants filed notices of related cases in the

25

two above-captioned actions, listing a number of cases filed in the Eastern District of California

26

that are purportedly related to Dena M. Mills, et al. v. Bayer Corp., et al., 1:16-cv-01075-DAD-

27

EPG. Case Number 1:16-cv-01075-DAD-EPG is the lowest numbered case among these actions,

28
1

1

and was previously assigned to the undersigned. Local Rule 123 permits the judge to whom the

2

lowest numbered case is assigned to reassign all higher numbered related actions to himself or

3

herself, if they determine reassignment is “likely to effect a savings of judicial effort or other

4

economies.” L.R. 123(c). Because Case Number 1:16-cv-01075-DAD-EPG was voluntarily

5

dismissed on October 16, 2016, and no hearings of any kind were held before the court prior to

6

that voluntary dismissal, the undersigned concludes no judicial effort will be saved by relating

7

and re-assigning the subsequently filed cases. Therefore, the court declines to issue an order

8

relating these cases.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10

Dated:

April 17, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2