Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC v. Nordstrom et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/22/17 ORDERING Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (a)(1)(A)(ii) and (a)(2), the complaint filed in the captioned action by Fidelity against Defendants is DISMISSED with prejudice; No a ward of attorneys' fees or costs, or of expert fees or costs, is or shall be made in favor of any party; and the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between Fidelity and Defendants, and to resolve any disputes relating to, or arising under, the Settlement Agreement. CASE CLOSED (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Locke Lord LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600 Los Angeles, CA 90071 10 11 Nina Huerta (SBN 229070) nhuerta@lockelord.com Locke Lord LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 485-1500 Fax: (213) 485-1200 Jennifer A. Kenedy (pro hac vice) jkenedy@lockelord.com Locke Lord LLP 111 South Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 Tel: (312) 443-0700 Fax: (312) 443-0336 Counsel for Plaintiff FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES LLC 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 15 16 17 FIDELITY BROKERAGE SERVICES LLC, Plaintiff, 18 19 v. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 JOHN NORDSTROM; and INNOVATION WEALTH MANAGEMENT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00594-JAM-KJN Hon. Judge John A. Mendez ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT, WITH PREJUDICE [Joint Stipulation and Request for Dismissal of Complaint, With Prejudice Filed Concurrently Herewith] 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Locke Lord LLP 300 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2600 Los Angeles, CA 90071 10 11 12 13 14 The Court, having considered the Joint Stipulation and Request for Dismissal of Complaint, with Prejudice, filed by Plaintiff Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC (“Fidelity”) and Defendants John Nordstrom (“Nordstrom”) and Innovation Wealth Management (“IWM”) (collectively, “Defendants”), to dismiss in its entirety and with prejudice the parties and claims in the above-captioned matter, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby orders as follows: 1. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (a)(1)(A)(ii) and (a)(2), the complaint filed in the captioned action by Fidelity against Defendants be dismissed with prejudice; 2. No award of attorneys’ fees or costs, or of expert fees or costs, is or shall be made in favor of any party; and 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement entered into between Fidelity and Defendants, and to resolve any disputes relating to, or arising under, the Settlement Agreement. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 Dated: May 22, 2017 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ Hon. Judge John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?