Celestine v. FCA US LLC

Filing 62

ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/11/2019. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY CELESTINE, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 v. FCA US LLC, Defendant. 15 16 17 ) Case No.: 2:17-cv-0597- JLT ) ) ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL ORDER ) (Doc. 58) ) ) ) ) ) ) The plaintiff has filed a document titled “Plaintiff’s Objection to the Tentative Pre-Trial Order,” 18 but, in fact, it is a stipulation by the parties to modify the pretrial order. (Doc. 58) First, the plaintiff 19 complied with the Court’s order to identify the witnesses who he expects may be called to testify at trial 20 and to identify the Service Advisor at Premier Chrysler Jeep Dodge who will be called. He has done 21 that (Doc. 55) and the defense has no objection to the new witness list. 22 Second, the plaintiff reports that the parties request that “the punitive damages issue should be 23 bifurcated.” (Doc. 58 at 2). The stipulation is vague as to whether they intend the issue of entitlement 24 to punitive damages to be bifurcated as well as the issue of the amount of punitive damages. The Court 25 finds that bifurcating the amount of punitive damages has the potential to preserve court resources and 26 the jury’s time but bifurcating whether the plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages would not. Indeed, 27 bifurcating this issue poses the potential of causing repetition of evidence. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 28 1. The Court amends the pretrial order (Doc. 54) to substitute the witness list in Doc. 55 for 1 1 2 3 those witnesses currently listed in the pretrial order; 2. The Court bifurcates the issue of the amount of punitive damages for the rest of the trial but will not bifurcate the issue of whether the plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 11, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?