Celestine v. FCA US LLC
Filing
62
ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/11/2019. (Hall, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LARRY CELESTINE,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
FCA US LLC,
Defendant.
15
16
17
) Case No.: 2:17-cv-0597- JLT
)
) ORDER AMENDING PRETRIAL ORDER
) (Doc. 58)
)
)
)
)
)
)
The plaintiff has filed a document titled “Plaintiff’s Objection to the Tentative Pre-Trial Order,”
18
but, in fact, it is a stipulation by the parties to modify the pretrial order. (Doc. 58) First, the plaintiff
19
complied with the Court’s order to identify the witnesses who he expects may be called to testify at trial
20
and to identify the Service Advisor at Premier Chrysler Jeep Dodge who will be called. He has done
21
that (Doc. 55) and the defense has no objection to the new witness list.
22
Second, the plaintiff reports that the parties request that “the punitive damages issue should be
23
bifurcated.” (Doc. 58 at 2). The stipulation is vague as to whether they intend the issue of entitlement
24
to punitive damages to be bifurcated as well as the issue of the amount of punitive damages. The Court
25
finds that bifurcating the amount of punitive damages has the potential to preserve court resources and
26
the jury’s time but bifurcating whether the plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages would not. Indeed,
27
bifurcating this issue poses the potential of causing repetition of evidence. Thus, the Court ORDERS:
28
1.
The Court amends the pretrial order (Doc. 54) to substitute the witness list in Doc. 55 for
1
1
2
3
those witnesses currently listed in the pretrial order;
2.
The Court bifurcates the issue of the amount of punitive damages for the rest of the trial
but will not bifurcate the issue of whether the plaintiff is entitled to punitive damages.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
June 11, 2019
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?