Varfolomeeva v. United States of America
Filing
12
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/29/17, ORDERING that Initial disclosures shall be made no later than 6/26/2017. Discovery shall be completed by 7/30/2018. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed by 10/18/2018. Pretrial Conference is SET for 12/6/2018 at 11:00 AM, and the Jury Trial is SET for 1/22/2019 at 09:00 AM, in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALINA VARFOLOMEEVA,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-00599-CKD
Plaintiff,
v.
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
15
16
Defendant.
17
18
READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES THAT
19
THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND
20
PARTIES MUST COMPLY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER
21
MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER APPROPRIATE
22
SANCTIONS, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT.
23
Plaintiff filed the complaint on March 21, 2017 and the action was assigned to United
24
States District Court Judge Morrison C. England Jr. (ECF No. 1.) After all parties consented to
25
the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
26
636(c), the action was reassigned to the undersigned for all further proceedings and entry of final
27
judgment. (ECF Nos. 8–10.) One June 2, 2017, all dates set before Judge England were vacated
28
(ECF No. 10), including the pretrial schedule that the parties had previously stipulated to. (ECF
1
1
No. 7.) On June 28, 2017, the parties stipulated to adopt the prior scheduling order. (EFC No.
2
11.) The court adopts the prior dates parties stipulated to (see ECF. No. 7) and makes the
3
following findings and orders.
4
NATURE OF THE CASE
5
This case arises from a motor vehicle accident involving a pedestrian. On November 19,
6
2014, plaintiff Alina Varfolomeeva alleges she was in a crosswalk at the intersection of J Street
7
and Fifth Street in Sacramento, California, when a vehicle operated by a federal employee struck
8
her in violation of California Vehicle Code section 21950(a). Plaintiff further alleges that the
9
collision caused her personal injuries and other economic and noneconomic damages. Plaintiff
10
maintains this action against the United States of America pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims
11
Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671–80, which provides the exclusive remedy for personal injuries
12
arising from the alleged negligent acts or omissions of federal employees acting within the scope
13
of their employment. Id. § 2679(b)(1).
14
SERVICE OF PROCESS
15
All named defendants have been served and have appeared. No further service is
16
permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown.
17
JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENT OF PLEADINGS
All named defendants have answered plaintiffs’ complaint. No further joinder of parties
18
19
or amendments to pleadings are permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been
20
shown.
21
JURISDICTION/VENUE
22
23
Jurisdiction and venue are undisputed, and are hereby found to be proper.
STIPULATED SCHEDULE
24
Deadline to serve initial disclosures................................................... June 26, 2017
25
Deadline to complete fact discovery ......................................... December 18, 2017
26
Deadline for Plaintiff’s initial expert disclosures.......................... January 29, 2018
27
Deadline for Defendant’s initial expert disclosures ........................ March 26, 2018
28
Deadline for supplemental (i.e., rebuttal) expert disclosures............. May 28, 2018
2
1
Deadline to complete expert discovery ...............................................July 30, 2018
2
Deadline for filing dispositive motions.....................................September 17, 2018
3
DISCOVERY
As stipulated, all discovery shall be completed by July 30, 2018. The word “completed”
4
5
means that all discovery shall have been conducted so that all depositions have been taken and any
6
disputes relative to discovery shall have been resolved by appropriate order if necessary and, where
7
discovery has been ordered, the order has been complied with.
8
MOTION HEARING SCHEDULE
9
All law and motion, except as to discovery-related matters, shall be completed by
10
October 18, 2018. The word “completed” in this context means that all law and motion matters
11
must be heard by the above date. The parties are cautioned to refer to the local rules regarding
12
the requirements for noticing such motions on the court’s regularly scheduled law and motion
13
calendar. This paragraph does not preclude motions for continuances, temporary restraining
14
orders or other emergency applications, and is subject to any special scheduling set forth in the
15
“MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS” paragraph below
16
The parties should keep in mind that the purpose of law and motion is to narrow and
17
refine the legal issues raised by the case and to dispose of by pretrial motion those issues that are
18
susceptible to resolution without trial. To accomplish that purpose, the parties need to identify
19
and fully research the issues presented by the case, and then examine those issues in light of the
20
evidence obtained through discovery. If it appears to counsel after examining the legal issues and
21
facts that an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, counsel are to file the appropriate motion
22
consistent with the law and motion cutoff set forth above.
23
ALL PURELY LEGAL ISSUES ARE TO BE RESOLVED BY TIMELY PRETRIAL
24
MOTION. The parties are reminded that motions in limine are procedural devices designed to
25
address the admissibility of evidence. THE PARTIES ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE COURT
26
WILL LOOK WITH DISFAVOR UPON SUBSTANTIVE MOTIONS PRESENTED IN THE
27
GUISE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE AT THE TIME OF TRIAL.
28
/////
3
1
2
3
4
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
The final pretrial conference is set before the undersigned on December 6, 2018, at 11:00
a.m., in Courtroom No. 24. Trial counsel shall appear at the Final Pretrial Conference.
The parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no
5
matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. The
6
parties are referred to Local Rules 281 and 282 relating to the contents of and time for filing
7
Pretrial Statements. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES 281 AND 282 WILL
8
BE GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS.
9
Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 281, which contemplates the filing of separate
10
Pretrial Statements by plaintiffs and defendants, the parties are to prepare a JOINT STATEMENT
11
with respect to the undisputed facts and disputed factual issues of the case. The undisputed facts and
12
disputed factual issues are to be set forth in two separate sections. The parties should identify those
13
facts that are relevant to each separate cause of action. In this regard, the parties are to number each
14
individual fact or factual issue. Where the parties are unable to agree as to what factual issues are
15
properly before the court for trial, they should nevertheless list in the section on “DISPUTED
16
FACTUAL ISSUES” all issues asserted by any of the parties and explain by parenthetical the
17
controversy concerning each issue. The parties should keep in mind that, in general, each fact should
18
relate or correspond to an element of the relevant cause of action. The parties should also keep in
19
mind that the purpose of listing the disputed factual issues is to apprise the court and all parties about
20
the precise issues that will be litigated at trial. The court is not interested in a listing of all evidentiary
21
facts underlying the issues that are in dispute. However, with respect to the listing of undisputed
22
facts, the court will accept agreements as to evidentiary facts. The joint statement of undisputed facts
23
and disputed factual issues is to be filed with the court concurrently with the filing of plaintiff’s
24
Pretrial Statement. If the case is tried to a jury, the undisputed facts will be read to the jury.
25
Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b)(10) and (11), the parties are required to provide in their Pretrial
26
Statements a list of witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter for what
27
purpose. These lists shall not be contained in the Pretrial Statement itself, but shall be attached as
28
separate documents to be used as addenda to the Final Pretrial Order. Plaintiff’s exhibits shall be
4
1
listed numerically; defendant’s exhibits shall be listed alphabetically. The Pretrial Order will contain
2
a stringent standard for the proffering of witnesses and exhibits at trial not listed in the Pretrial Order.
3
Counsel are cautioned that the standard will be strictly applied. On the other hand, the listing of
4
exhibits or witnesses which counsel do not intend to call or use will be viewed as an abuse of the
5
court’s processes.
6
The parties are also reminded that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, it will be their duty at the
7
Pretrial Conference to aid the court in (a) formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination
8
of frivolous claims or defenses; (b) settling of facts which should be properly admitted; and (c) the
9
avoidance of unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. The parties must prepare their Pretrial
10
Statements, and participate in good faith at the Pretrial Conference, with these aims in mind. A
11
FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS which may include
12
monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, eliminations of claims or defenses, or such other
13
sanctions as the court deems appropriate.
14
TRIAL SETTING
15
Trial is set on January 22, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 24 before the
16
undersigned. Trial will be by jury.
17
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
18
If the parties determine a settlement conference would be beneficial, the courtroom deputy
19
may be contacted to arrange a date for the settlement conference. In absence of a waiver of
20
disqualification of the undersigned, the settlement conference will be set before another magistrate
21
judge.
22
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
23
24
25
26
There appear to be no other matters presently pending before the court that will aid the
just and expeditious disposition of this matter.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), THE COURT SUMMARIZES THE SCHEDULING
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
27
1. Initial disclosures shall be made no later than June 26, 2017.
28
2. Discovery shall be completed by July 30, 2018.
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be completed by
October 18, 2018.
4. Pretrial conference is set for December 6, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24
before the undersigned.
5. This matter is set for jury trial on January 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 24
before the undersigned.
Dated: June 29, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?