Varfolomeeva v. United States of America
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/30/17 ADOPTING the 3 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, 7 Stipulation and Order; DEEMING said orders effective for the proceedings currently before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Becknal, R)
1 KIRILL B. TARASENKO
State Bar No. 283986
2 TARASENKO LAW OFFICE
845 University Ave.
3 Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone:
888-878-0830
4 Facsimile:
916-848-3323
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
ALINA VARFOLOMEEVA
6
7 PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
8 JOSEPH B. FRUEH
Assistant United States Attorneys
9 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
10 E-mail:
joseph.frueh@usdoj.gov
Telephone: (916) 554-2702
11 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
12 Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
13
14
15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
ALINA VARFOLOMEEVA,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
30
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
Case No. 2:17-cv-00599-CKD
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
ADOPTING PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDER,
AS AMENDED
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties and subject to Court approval, that
2 the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 3), as amended by the Stipulation and Order Modifying
3 Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 7), be adopted and deemed effective for proceedings before the
4 Honorable Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The reasons for this Stipulation are as follows:
5
1.
The Honorable District Judge Morrison C. England entered the Initial Pretrial Scheduling
6 Order in the above-captioned action on March 21, 2017.
7
2.
The parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order Modifying the Initial Pretrial
8 Scheduling Order on May 23, 2017, which Judge England approved and entered on May 25, 2017.
9
3.
The parties consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction on May 25, 2017.
10
4.
The above-captioned action was reassigned to Judge Delaney on June 1, 2017, and “[a]ll
11 currently scheduled dates . . . set before Judge England [were thereby] VACATED.” ECF No. 10, at 2.
12
5.
The parties previously met and conferred pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of
13 Civil Procedure and Local Rule 240(b) to determine the schedule and other understandings entered by
14 the Court on May 25, 2017, and the parties wish to continue litigating this action accordingly.
15 Dated: June 26, 2017
16
TARASENKO LAW OFFICE
By:
17
/s/ Kirill B. Tarasenko (authorized on 6/26/2017)
KIRILL B. TARASENKO, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff
18
19 Dated: June 28, 2017
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
20
By:
21
22
/s/ Joseph B. Frueh
JOSEPH B. FRUEH
Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
23
24
25 IT IS SO ORDERED
26
27
Dated: June 30, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
30
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
ADOPTING PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDER, AS AMENDED
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?