Varfolomeeva v. United States of America

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/30/17 ADOPTING the 3 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, 7 Stipulation and Order; DEEMING said orders effective for the proceedings currently before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 KIRILL B. TARASENKO State Bar No. 283986 2 TARASENKO LAW OFFICE 845 University Ave. 3 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: 888-878-0830 4 Facsimile: 916-848-3323 5 Attorney for Plaintiff ALINA VARFOLOMEEVA 6 7 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 8 JOSEPH B. FRUEH Assistant United States Attorneys 9 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 10 E-mail: joseph.frueh@usdoj.gov Telephone: (916) 554-2702 11 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 12 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 13 14 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 ALINA VARFOLOMEEVA, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Case No. 2:17-cv-00599-CKD STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ADOPTING PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDER, AS AMENDED 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties and subject to Court approval, that 2 the Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 3), as amended by the Stipulation and Order Modifying 3 Pretrial Scheduling Order (ECF No. 7), be adopted and deemed effective for proceedings before the 4 Honorable Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The reasons for this Stipulation are as follows: 5 1. The Honorable District Judge Morrison C. England entered the Initial Pretrial Scheduling 6 Order in the above-captioned action on March 21, 2017. 7 2. The parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order Modifying the Initial Pretrial 8 Scheduling Order on May 23, 2017, which Judge England approved and entered on May 25, 2017. 9 3. The parties consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction on May 25, 2017. 10 4. The above-captioned action was reassigned to Judge Delaney on June 1, 2017, and “[a]ll 11 currently scheduled dates . . . set before Judge England [were thereby] VACATED.” ECF No. 10, at 2. 12 5. The parties previously met and conferred pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of 13 Civil Procedure and Local Rule 240(b) to determine the schedule and other understandings entered by 14 the Court on May 25, 2017, and the parties wish to continue litigating this action accordingly. 15 Dated: June 26, 2017 16 TARASENKO LAW OFFICE By: 17 /s/ Kirill B. Tarasenko (authorized on 6/26/2017) KIRILL B. TARASENKO, ESQ. Attorney for Plaintiff 18 19 Dated: June 28, 2017 PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney 20 By: 21 22 /s/ Joseph B. Frueh JOSEPH B. FRUEH Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED 26 27 Dated: June 30, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 30 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER ADOPTING PRIOR SCHEDULING ORDER, AS AMENDED 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?