Varfolomeeva v. United States of America

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/28/2018 as to 24 Motion to Compel; Motion Hearing RESET for 3/21/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney.(Fabillaran, J)

1 KIRILL B. TARASENKO
State Bar No. 283986
2 TARASENKO LAW OFFICE
845 University Ave.
3 Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone:
888-878-0830
4 Facsimile:
916-848-3323
5 Attorney for Plaintiff
ALINA VARFOLOMEEVA
6
7 MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney
8 JOSEPH B. FRUEH
Assistant United States Attorneys
9 501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
10 E-mail:
[e-mail]
Telephone: [phone]
11 Facsimile: [phone]
12 Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
13
14
15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18

ALINA VARFOLOMEEVA,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

30

Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 2:17-cv-00599-CKD
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR CONTINUING HEARING ON
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF
No. 24)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

Current Hearing Date:

March 7, 2018

Proposed Hearing Date:

March 21, 2018

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties and subject to Court approval, that

2 the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Compel (ECF No. 24) currently scheduled for March 7, 2018, at
3 10:00 a.m., be continued to March 21, 2018, at 10:00 a.m. The reason for this stipulation is to
4 accommodate the litigation schedule of Plaintiff’s counsel in other matters.
5
6 Dated: February 26, 2018

TARASENKO LAW OFFICE

7
By:

8
9

/s/ Kirill B. Tarasenko (authorized on 2/26/2018)
KIRILL B. TARASENKO, ESQ.
Attorney for Plaintiff

10
11 Dated: February 27, 2018

MCGREGOR W. SCOTT
United States Attorney

12
13

By:

14

/s/ Joseph B. Frueh
JOSEPH B. FRUEH
Assistant United States Attorney

15

Attorneys for Defendant

16
17 IT IS SO ORDERED
18
19

Dated: February 28, 2018

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

30

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER CONTINUING
HEARING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL

1