Ortiz v. Enhanced Recovery Company

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/24/17: Hearing as to 10 Motion to Strike is continued to 8/4/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff's untimely July 20, 2017 opposition 15 on or before July 28, 2017. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RENE ORTIZ, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0607 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 8, 2017, defendant filed a motion to strike and noticed that motion for hearing 20 before the undersigned on July 28, 2017. (ECF No. 10.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c) plaintiff 21 was to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion “not less than 22 fourteen (14) days preceding the noticed . . . hearing date.” Plaintiff, however, filed an untimely 23 opposition on July 20, 2017. (ECF No. 15.) 24 Plaintiff is advised that any individual representing himself or herself without an attorney 25 is nonetheless bound by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules, and all applicable 26 law. See Local Rule 183(a). A party’s failure to comply with applicable rules and law may be 27 grounds for dismissal or any other sanction appropriate under the Local Rules. Id. Because 28 plaintiff’s failure to file a timely opposition may have denied the defendant an opportunity to file 1 1 a timely reply the undersigned will continue the hearing of defendant’s motion to strike. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The July 28, 2017 hearing of defendant’s motion to strike (ECF No. 10) is continued to 4 Friday, August 4, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, 5 Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned; and 6 2. Defendant may file a reply to plaintiff’s untimely July 20, 2017 opposition (ECF No. 7 15) on or before July 28, 2017. 8 Dated: July 24, 2017 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DLB:6 DB/orders/orders.pro se/ortiz0607.cont.hrg 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?