Ortiz v. Enhanced Recovery Company
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/28/2017 CONTINUING the Motion Hearing on 10 Motion to Strike to 9/1/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes; ORDERING the plaintiff to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to said motion by 8/18/2017; ORDERING the defendant to file any reply by 8/25/2017. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RENE ORTIZ,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-0607 KJM DB PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY,
Defendant.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the
undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
On June 8, 2017, defendant filed a motion to strike and noticed that motion for hearing
20
before the undersigned on July 28, 2017. (ECF No. 10.) On July 25, 2017, the undersigned
21
issued an order continuing the hearing of defendant’s motion to August 4, 2017. (ECF No. 16.)
22
On July 27, 2017, however, plaintiff filed a request to continue the August 4, 2017 hearing. (ECF
23
No. 19.) Therein, plaintiff explains that he will be out of the country on August 4, 2017. Good
24
cause appearing, plaintiff’s request for a continuation will be granted.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. The August 4, 2017 hearing of defendant’s motion to strike (ECF No. 10) is continued
27
to Friday, September 1, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street,
28
Sacramento, California, in Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned;
1
1
2
3
4
2. Plaintiff may file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendant’s motion
on or before August 18, 2017; and
3. Defendant may file a reply on or before August 25, 2017.
Dated: July 28, 2017
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
DLB:6
DB/orders/orders.pro se/ortiz0607.cont2.hrg
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?