Ortiz v. Enhanced Recovery Company

Filing 90

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/28/19 DENYING 89 and 88 Requests for hearing.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RENE ORTIZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-cv-0607 KJM DB PS

v.

ORDER

ENHANCED RECOVERY COMPANY,

15

Defendant.

16
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the

17
18

undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On June 17,

19

2019, the undersigned took under submission several pending motions and vacated the hearing of

20

those motions. (ECF No. 85.) On June 24, 2019, and June 26, 2019, plaintiff filed requests

21

asking that those motions be placed back on for hearing. (ECF Nos. 88 & 89.)
At this time, the undersigned finds that no further briefing or hearing is necessary for

22
23

resolving the motions and that they may be decided without hearing pursuant to Local Rule

24

230(g). If, after further evaluation, the undersigned finds that further briefing and/or a hearing

25

would be helpful, the undersigned will order such.

26

////

27

////

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. Plaintiff’s June 24, 2019 request for a hearing (ECF No. 88) is denied; and

3

2. Plaintiff’s June 26, 2019 request for a hearing (ECF No. 89) is denied.

4

DATED: June 28, 2019

5

/s/ DEBORAH BARNES
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

DLB:6
DB/orders/orders.pro se/ortiz0607.subm.ord

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2