Weller v. Healthnow New York, Inc. et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/12/2017 ORDERING that HealthNow New York Inc. respond to the initial complaint by 5/30/2017. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Lawrance A. Bohm (SBN: 208716)
BOHM LAW GROUP, INC.
4600 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 210
Sacramento, California 95834
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 916.927.2046
[e-mail]
Robert L. Boucher (SBN: 244760)
BOUCHER LAW
2121 Natomas Crossing Drive, Suite 200-239
Sacramento, California 95834
Telephone: [phone]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Attorneys for Plaintiff
DAVE WELLER
Kurt A. Kappes (SBN 146384)
Michelle DuCharme (SBN 285572)
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
1201 K Street, Suite 1100
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 916.448.1709
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. and
HEALTHNOW NEW YORK INC.

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

21
22

DAVE WELLER,

23

Plaintiff,

24

v.

25

CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE
PLEADING DEADLINE OF DEFENDANT
HEALTHNOW NEW YORK, INC.

HEALTHNOW NEW YORK, INC.;
HEALTHNOW; BROKERAGE CONCEPTS,
INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

26
27

Defendants.

28
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE OF
DEFENDANT HEALTHNOW NEW YORK, INC.

Plaintiff Dave Weller (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. (“BCI”), by and

1
2

through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the initial Complaint in this action was served on BCI on February 22, 2017 (ECF

3
4

No. 1-1 at 47–48);

5

WHEREAS, this action was removed to this court on March 24, 2017 (ECF No. 1);

6

WHEREAS, BCI filed a response to the Complaint on March 31, 2017 (ECF No. 4);

7

WHEREAS, the initial Complaint in this action was served on Defendant HealthNow New York

8

Inc. (“HNNY”) on March 23, 2017 (ECF No. 7);

9

WHEREAS, on April 13, 2017, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Extend Responsive

10

Pleading Deadline of Defendant HealthNow New York, Inc. from April 17, 2017 to May 15, 2017 (ECF

11

No. 9);
WHEREAS, the deadline for HNNY to respond to the initial Complaint is currently May 15,

12
13

2017;
WHEREAS, the Parties are working together to determine who the proper Defendants in this

14
15

matter are and anticipate reaching an agreement in the next two weeks.

16

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties, by and through their

17

respective counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE and AGREE to extend the time for HealthNow

18

New York Inc. to respond to the initial Complaint by fifteen (15) days, from the current response date of

19

May 15, 2017 to the new response date of May 30, 2017.

20
21

DATED: May 12, 2017

BOUCHER LAW

22
23

By: /s/Robert L. Boucher
Robert L. Boucher
Attorney for Plaintiff
DAVE WELLER

24
25
26

///

27

///

28

.

///
1
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE OF
DEFENDANT HEALTHNOW NEW YORK, INC.

1

DATED: May 12, 2017

GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP

2
3

By /s/ Michelle L. DuCharme
Kurt A. Kappes
Michelle L. DuCharme
Attorneys for Defendants
BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. and
HEALTHNOW NEW YORK INC.

4
5
6
7

ORDER

8
9

In view of the parties’ Stipulation, the Court orders the time for HealthNow New York Inc. to

10

respond to the initial Complaint by fifteen (15) days, from the current response date of May 15, 2017 to

11

the new response date of May 30, 2017.

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

Dated:

5/12/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
Honorable John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
Eastern District of California

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
SECOND JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE OF
DEFENDANT HEALTHNOW NEW YORK, INC.