Weller v. Healthnow New York, Inc. et al

Filing 15

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/5/2017 ORDERING that the First Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A, is deemed filed and served on Defendants Brokerage Concepts, Inc., HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Admini strative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. as of the date of this Order. Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. are hereby DISMISSED from this lawsuit without prejudice and any claims by Plaintiff not already barred against these defendants are tolled during the pendency of this lawsuit. Defendant HealthNow, Inc. is hereby DISMISSED from this lawsuit without prejudice. Brokerage Concepts, Inc. shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BOHM LAW GROUP, INC. 4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834 11 Lawrance A. Bohm (SBN: 208716) lbohm@bohmlaw.com BOHM LAW GROUP 4600 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 210 Sacramento, California 95834 Telephone: 916.927.5574 Facsimile: 916.927.2046 Robert L. Boucher (SBN: 244760) robert@boucher-law.com BOUCHER LAW 2121 Natomas Crossing Drive, Suite 200-239 Sacramento, CA 95834 Telephone: 916.974.9756 Attorneys for Plaintiffs, DAVE WELLER 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 DAVE WELLER, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 19 20 21 22 23 Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB STIPULATION TO DISMISS MISNAMED DEFENDANTS AND ORDER (Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 41) HEALTHNOW NEW YORK, INC.; HEALTHNOW, INC.; BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC.; HEALTHNOW SYSTEMS, INC.; HEALTHNOW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INDIVIDUALLY and dba BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 24 Defendants. 25 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al. Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. Robert L. Boucher, Esq. 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS: Plaintiff DAVE WELLER by and through his counsel of record Lawrance A. Bohm, and 3 Robert L. Boucher, and Defendants BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC., HEALTHNOW NEW 4 YORK INC., HEALTHNOW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (a DBA of Brokerage 5 Concepts, Inc.), and HEALTHNOW SYSTEMS, INC. (together, “Defendants”), by and through 6 their counsel of record, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, stipulate to the dismissal under Federal Rules 7 of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) without prejudice of the following named Defendants: 8 HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage 9 Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. (See, Wilson v. Crouse-Hinds Co., 556 F.2d 870, 10 873 (8th Cir. 1977) (allowing dismissal under Rule 41(a) of only part of an action per, “a 11 BOHM LAW GROUP, INC. 4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834 2 stipulation signed by all the parties or an order of the court”).) This stipulation is based on the 12 following grounds: 13 WHEREAS, Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. timely removed this action to 14 federal court on March 24, 2017. As related entities, Defendants HealthNow New York 15 Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and 16 HealthNow Systems, Inc. join in and consent to the removal. 17 WHEREAS, on May 22, 2017, the parties met and confer regarding service of 18 process and Plaintiff represented he properly served all parties with process as to the First 19 Amended Complaint. Defendants hereby agree to accept service of the First Amended 20 Complaint as of the date of the filing of this stipulation. 21 WHEREAS, the Defendants represent to Plaintiff and the Court that: 22 (1) HEALTHNOW, INC. is not affiliated in any way with Defendants. Defendants 23 believe that HEALTHNOW, INC. is a dissolved California corporation and that, in 24 any event, was never associated with the HealthNow New York Inc. corporate 25 structure. 26 (2) HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of 27 Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. were never Plaintiff’s 28 employer. Instead, Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. employed Mr. Weller. Even 2 Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al. Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. Robert L. Boucher, Esq. 1 though the name “HealthNow New York Inc.” may have been on some of Plaintiff’s 2 employment forms, HealthNow New York Inc. was included on those forms simply 3 because Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. is a subsidiary of HealthNow Holdings 4 Inc., which in turn is a subsidiary of HealthNow New York Inc. 5 WHEREAS, without waiving any right to post-trial motions or appeal, Defendants agree 6 to be liable on any verdict or judgment which is entered either against the dismissed Defendants 7 HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage 8 Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. or is based on evidence that the dismissed 9 Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of 10 Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. were actually the liable parties. BOHM LAW GROUP, INC. 4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834 11 WHEREAS, without waiving any right to post-trial motions or appeal, Defendant 12 Brokerage Concepts, Inc. agrees to waive its right to defend this suit on the ground that the 13 dismissed Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA 14 of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. were liable in any way. 15 WHEREAS, if it is later proven that the dismissed Defendants HealthNow New York 16 Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow 17 Systems, Inc. were properly named, Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. stipulates to a later 18 amendment to add the dismissed Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow 19 Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. 20 (“Dismissed Defendants”) as parties to this lawsuit, notwithstanding the otherwise-applicable 21 statutes of limitations, provided that any otherwise-applicable limitations had not already 22 expired on the date by when Plaintiff filed his Complaint naming the Dismissed Defendants in 23 this lawsuit. 24 WHEREAS, based on Defendants’ representations, Plaintiff agrees that suit against 25 Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of 26 Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. would be futile, and that these 27 dismissed Defendants are not proper Defendants in this action. 28 WHEREAS, based on Defendants’ representations, Plaintiff also agrees that suit against 3 Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al. Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. Robert L. Boucher, Esq. 1 Defendant HealthNow, Inc., which Defendants represent is not affiliated with the HealthNow 2 New York Inc. corporate structure, would be futile. 3 4 WHEREAS, this stipulation only dismisses claims against the dismissed Defendants; suit against Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. remains in effect. 5 WHEREAS, the parties agree to bear their own costs as to suit against the dismissed 6 Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of 7 Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc., and Plaintiff agrees to bear his own 8 costs as to suit against the dismissed Defendant HealthNow, Inc. 9 10 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED BY the Parties that: (1) The First Amended Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A, be deemed filed BOHM LAW GROUP, INC. 4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834 11 and served on Defendants Brokerage Concepts, Inc., HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow 12 Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. on 13 the date the Court enters an order on this stipulation. 14 (2) Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a 15 DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. be dismissed from this 16 lawsuit without prejudice, and any claims by Plaintiff not already barred against these 17 defendants are tolled during the pendency of this lawsuit. 18 19 20 21 (3) Plaintiff hereby dismisses Defendant HealthNow, Inc. from this lawsuit without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (4) Brokerage Concepts, Inc. shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date the Court enters an order on this stipulation. 22 23 Dated: June 2, 2017 BOHM LAW GROUP, INC. 24 By: /s/ Robert L. Boucher LAWRANCE A. BOHM, ESQ. ROBERT L. BOUCHER, ESQ. 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff, DAVE WELLER 27 28 4 Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al. Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. Robert L. Boucher, Esq. 1 /// Dated: June 2, 2017 GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP. 2 3 By: /s/ Kurt A. Kappes 4 KURT A. KAPPES, ESQ. MICHELLE L. DUCHARME, ESQ. 5 Attorneys for Defendants, BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC., HEALTHNOW NEW YORK INC., HEALTHNOW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HEALTHNOW SYSTEMS, INC. 6 7 8 9 10 BOHM LAW GROUP, INC. 4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834 11 ORDER 12 In view of the parties’ Stipulation, the Court orders as follows: 13 (1) The First Amended Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is deemed filed and 14 served on Defendants Brokerage Concepts, Inc., HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow 15 Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. as 16 of the date of this Order. 17 (2) Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a 18 DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. are hereby dismissed from 19 this lawsuit without prejudice and any claims by Plaintiff not already barred against these 20 defendants are tolled during the pendency of this lawsuit. 21 (3) 22 prejudice. 23 (4) 24 25 Defendant HealthNow, Inc. is hereby dismissed from this lawsuit without Brokerage Concepts, Inc. shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: 6/5/2017 28 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________ John Mendez United States District Court Judge Eastern District of California 5 Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al. Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq. Robert L. Boucher, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?