Weller v. Healthnow New York, Inc. et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/5/2017 ORDERING that the First Amended Complaint, attached as Exhibit A, is deemed filed and served on Defendants Brokerage Concepts, Inc., HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Admini strative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. as of the date of this Order. Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. are hereby DISMISSED from this lawsuit without prejudice and any claims by Plaintiff not already barred against these defendants are tolled during the pendency of this lawsuit. Defendant HealthNow, Inc. is hereby DISMISSED from this lawsuit without prejudice. Brokerage Concepts, Inc. shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BOHM LAW GROUP, INC.
4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834
11
Lawrance A. Bohm (SBN: 208716)
lbohm@bohmlaw.com
BOHM LAW GROUP
4600 Northgate Boulevard, Suite 210
Sacramento, California 95834
Telephone: 916.927.5574
Facsimile: 916.927.2046
Robert L. Boucher (SBN: 244760)
robert@boucher-law.com
BOUCHER LAW
2121 Natomas Crossing Drive, Suite 200-239
Sacramento, CA 95834
Telephone: 916.974.9756
Attorneys for Plaintiffs,
DAVE WELLER
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
DAVE WELLER,
16
Plaintiffs,
17
v.
18
19
20
21
22
23
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
MISNAMED DEFENDANTS AND
ORDER
(Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 41)
HEALTHNOW NEW YORK, INC.;
HEALTHNOW, INC.; BROKERAGE
CONCEPTS, INC.; HEALTHNOW
SYSTEMS, INC.; HEALTHNOW
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES,
INDIVIDUALLY and dba BROKERAGE
CONCEPTS, INC.; and DOES 1 through
100, inclusive,
24
Defendants.
25
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants
Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq.
Robert L. Boucher, Esq.
1
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS:
Plaintiff DAVE WELLER by and through his counsel of record Lawrance A. Bohm, and
3
Robert L. Boucher, and Defendants BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC., HEALTHNOW NEW
4
YORK INC., HEALTHNOW ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES (a DBA of Brokerage
5
Concepts, Inc.), and HEALTHNOW SYSTEMS, INC. (together, “Defendants”), by and through
6
their counsel of record, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, stipulate to the dismissal under Federal Rules
7
of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) without prejudice of the following named Defendants:
8
HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage
9
Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. (See, Wilson v. Crouse-Hinds Co., 556 F.2d 870,
10
873 (8th Cir. 1977) (allowing dismissal under Rule 41(a) of only part of an action per, “a
11
BOHM LAW GROUP, INC.
4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834
2
stipulation signed by all the parties or an order of the court”).) This stipulation is based on the
12
following grounds:
13
WHEREAS, Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. timely removed this action to
14
federal court on March 24, 2017. As related entities, Defendants HealthNow New York
15
Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and
16
HealthNow Systems, Inc. join in and consent to the removal.
17
WHEREAS, on May 22, 2017, the parties met and confer regarding service of
18
process and Plaintiff represented he properly served all parties with process as to the First
19
Amended Complaint. Defendants hereby agree to accept service of the First Amended
20
Complaint as of the date of the filing of this stipulation.
21
WHEREAS, the Defendants represent to Plaintiff and the Court that:
22
(1) HEALTHNOW, INC. is not affiliated in any way with Defendants. Defendants
23
believe that HEALTHNOW, INC. is a dissolved California corporation and that, in
24
any event, was never associated with the HealthNow New York Inc. corporate
25
structure.
26
(2) HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of
27
Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. were never Plaintiff’s
28
employer. Instead, Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. employed Mr. Weller. Even
2
Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants
Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq.
Robert L. Boucher, Esq.
1
though the name “HealthNow New York Inc.” may have been on some of Plaintiff’s
2
employment forms, HealthNow New York Inc. was included on those forms simply
3
because Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. is a subsidiary of HealthNow Holdings
4
Inc., which in turn is a subsidiary of HealthNow New York Inc.
5
WHEREAS, without waiving any right to post-trial motions or appeal, Defendants agree
6
to be liable on any verdict or judgment which is entered either against the dismissed Defendants
7
HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage
8
Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. or is based on evidence that the dismissed
9
Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of
10
Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. were actually the liable parties.
BOHM LAW GROUP, INC.
4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834
11
WHEREAS, without waiving any right to post-trial motions or appeal, Defendant
12
Brokerage Concepts, Inc. agrees to waive its right to defend this suit on the ground that the
13
dismissed Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA
14
of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. were liable in any way.
15
WHEREAS, if it is later proven that the dismissed Defendants HealthNow New York
16
Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow
17
Systems, Inc. were properly named, Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. stipulates to a later
18
amendment to add the dismissed Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow
19
Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc.
20
(“Dismissed Defendants”) as parties to this lawsuit, notwithstanding the otherwise-applicable
21
statutes of limitations, provided that any otherwise-applicable limitations had not already
22
expired on the date by when Plaintiff filed his Complaint naming the Dismissed Defendants in
23
this lawsuit.
24
WHEREAS, based on Defendants’ representations, Plaintiff agrees that suit against
25
Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of
26
Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. would be futile, and that these
27
dismissed Defendants are not proper Defendants in this action.
28
WHEREAS, based on Defendants’ representations, Plaintiff also agrees that suit against
3
Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants
Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq.
Robert L. Boucher, Esq.
1
Defendant HealthNow, Inc., which Defendants represent is not affiliated with the HealthNow
2
New York Inc. corporate structure, would be futile.
3
4
WHEREAS, this stipulation only dismisses claims against the dismissed Defendants;
suit against Defendant Brokerage Concepts, Inc. remains in effect.
5
WHEREAS, the parties agree to bear their own costs as to suit against the dismissed
6
Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a DBA of
7
Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc., and Plaintiff agrees to bear his own
8
costs as to suit against the dismissed Defendant HealthNow, Inc.
9
10
IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED AND AGREED BY the Parties that:
(1)
The First Amended Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A, be deemed filed
BOHM LAW GROUP, INC.
4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834
11
and served on Defendants Brokerage Concepts, Inc., HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow
12
Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. on
13
the date the Court enters an order on this stipulation.
14
(2)
Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a
15
DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. be dismissed from this
16
lawsuit without prejudice, and any claims by Plaintiff not already barred against these
17
defendants are tolled during the pendency of this lawsuit.
18
19
20
21
(3)
Plaintiff hereby dismisses Defendant HealthNow, Inc. from this lawsuit without
prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).
(4)
Brokerage Concepts, Inc. shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint
within fourteen (14) days from the date the Court enters an order on this stipulation.
22
23
Dated: June 2, 2017
BOHM LAW GROUP, INC.
24
By: /s/ Robert L. Boucher
LAWRANCE A. BOHM, ESQ.
ROBERT L. BOUCHER, ESQ.
25
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
DAVE WELLER
27
28
4
Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants
Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq.
Robert L. Boucher, Esq.
1
///
Dated: June 2, 2017
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP.
2
3
By: /s/ Kurt A. Kappes
4
KURT A. KAPPES, ESQ.
MICHELLE L. DUCHARME, ESQ.
5
Attorneys for Defendants,
BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC.,
HEALTHNOW NEW YORK
INC., HEALTHNOW
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
(a DBA of Brokerage Concepts,
Inc.), and HEALTHNOW
SYSTEMS, INC.
6
7
8
9
10
BOHM LAW GROUP, INC.
4600 NORTHGATE BOULEVARD, SUITE 210
SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95834
11
ORDER
12
In view of the parties’ Stipulation, the Court orders as follows:
13
(1)
The First Amended Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A, is deemed filed and
14
served on Defendants Brokerage Concepts, Inc., HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow
15
Administrative Services (a DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. as
16
of the date of this Order.
17
(2)
Defendants HealthNow New York Inc., HealthNow Administrative Services (a
18
DBA of Brokerage Concepts, Inc.), and HealthNow Systems, Inc. are hereby dismissed from
19
this lawsuit without prejudice and any claims by Plaintiff not already barred against these
20
defendants are tolled during the pendency of this lawsuit.
21
(3)
22
prejudice.
23
(4)
24
25
Defendant HealthNow, Inc. is hereby dismissed from this lawsuit without
Brokerage Concepts, Inc. shall file a response to the First Amended Complaint
within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated: 6/5/2017
28
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________
John Mendez
United States District Court Judge
Eastern District of California
5
Stipulation to Dismiss Misnamed Defendants
Weller v. HealthNow New York, Inc., et al.
Case No.: 2:17-cv-00623-JAM-EFB
Lawrance A. Bohm, Esq.
Robert L. Boucher, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?