Borges v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 04/14/17 ORDERING that the 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED without prejudice; within 15 days, plaintiff shall either pay the filing fees or submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MATTHEW KELLEE BORGES,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-CV-0625-CMK
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
15
Defendant.
16
/
17
18
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under
19
42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security.
20
Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2).
21
The motion is incomplete. Specifically, in response to Question No. 2, plaintiff states that he is
22
not currently employed but does not respond at all to Question No. 2(b) regarding his last
23
employment, if any. Plaintiff will be provided an opportunity to either pay the filing fees for this
24
action or submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is
25
cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of the action. See Local
26
Rule 110.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
3
4
5
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied
without prejudice;
2.
Within 15 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall either pay the filing
fees for this action or submit a completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
6
7
8
9
DATED: April 14, 2017
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?