Thomas v. Superior Court of California County of Solano et al
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/8/2018 DENYING petitioner's 8 motion for default judgment. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ALDEN A. THOMAS,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0638 KJM DB P
v.
ORDER
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al.,
Respondents.
15
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
17
18
under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed a request for entry of default. (ECF No. 8.)
Petitioner claims respondent’s failure to respond entitles him to default judgment. (ECF
19
20
No. 8.) However, on October 25, 2017, the court issued findings and recommendations
21
recommending the petition be dismissed because petitioner does not have standing to sue on
22
behalf of a third party. (ECF No. 6.) Petitioner filed objections to the above referenced findings
23
and recommendations on November 13, 2017 and the District Court has not yet ruled. (ECF No.
24
7.)
25
Thus, respondent was not directed to respond to the petition and is not in default.
26
Additionally, petitioner is not entitled to a default judgment for the failure to respond to claims
27
raised in a petition for habeas corpus. See Gordon v. Duran, 895 F.2d 610, 612 (9th Cir. 1990).
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s March 1, 2018 motion for
2
default judgment (ECF No. 8) is denied.
3
Dated: March 8, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
DLB:12
DLB:1/Orders/Prisoner-Habeas/thom0638.hab.def
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?