Williams Sports Rentals Inc.

Filing 94

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/25/2020 CONTINUING hearing re 90 Motion to Lift Anti-Suit Injunction; Stay to 5/19/2020 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
5 ANTHONY L. LABEL (SBN 205920) STEVEN A. KRONENBERG (SBN 215541) THE VEEN FIRM 711 Van Ness Avenue Suite 220 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (888) 504-0157 Facsimile: (415) 771-5845 6 JOHN R. HILLSMAN 7 MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Avenue 8 San Francisco, CA 94133 Telephone: (415) 421-9292 Facsimile: (415) 403-0202 1 2 3 4 9 (SBN 71220) 10 11 Attorneys for MARIAN LATASHA WILLIS Personal Representative of the Estate of RAESHON WILLIAMS Respondent/ Counter Claimant 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 IN ADMIRALTY 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 In re: Complaint and Petition of WILLIAMS SPORTS RENTALS, INC., as Owner of a Certain 2004 YAMAHA WAVE RUNNER FX 140 (CF 5408 LE) for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:17-cv-00653-JAM-EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING RESPONDENT/ COUNTER CLAIMANT MARIAN LATASHA WILLIS’S MOTION TO LIFT THE ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION AND STAY FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN ADMIRALTY CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 10, 2020 24 25 26 27 28 McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Ave., Suite 100 San Francisco, CA 94133 (415) 421-9292 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Motion to Lift the Anti-Suit Injunction and Stay Further Proceedings No . 2:17-cv-00653-JAM-EFB 1 1 2 3 4 COME NOW THE PARTIES HEREIN, by and through their respective counsel, and hereby stipulate as follows: That whereas the parties herein, as well as the parties in the related case of Willis v. Zip, Inc., et al., Alameda County Superior Court case No. RG17866531, have initiated efforts to 5 reach a global settlement of both actions via private mediation, Respondent/ Counter Claimant 6 7 MARIAN LATASHA WILLIS’ Motion to Lift the Anti-suit Injunction and Stay Further 8 Proceedings in Admiralty currently scheduled to be heard at 1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, March 10, 2020 9 10 before the Honorable John A. Mendez in Courtroom 6 of this Court shall be continued to the new date of Tuesday, May 19, 2020 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 6. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 12 13 Dated: February 25, 2020 14 THE VEEN FIRM MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 15 By: /s/ John R. Hillsman John R. Hillsman Anthony L. Label Stephen S. Kronenberg Attorneys for Respondent/Counter Claimant MARIAN LATASHA WILLIS 16 17 18 19 20 Dated: February 25, 2020 21 22 23 24 25 WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ, EDELMAN & DICKER LLP By: /s/ B. Otis Felder B. Otis Felder Ian Stewart Eric S. Wong Attorneys for Petitioner WILLIAMS SPORTS RENTALS, INC. 26 27 28 McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Ave., Suite 100 San Francisco, CA 94133 (415) 421-9292 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Motion to Lift the Anti-Suit Injunction and Stay Further Proceedings No . 2:17-cv-00653-JAM-EFB 2 ORDER 1 2 3 4 The above Stipulation having been reviewed and considered, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent/ Counter Claimant Marian Latasha Willis’s 5 Motion to Lift the Anti-suit Injunction and Stay Further Proceedings in Admiralty currently 6 7 scheduled for March 10, 2020 be, and hereby is, continued to the new date of Tuesday, May 19, 8 2020, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 6 of this Court. 9 10 11 12 Dated: 2/25/2020 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________ HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 McGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Ave., Suite 100 San Francisco, CA 94133 (415) 421-9292 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Continuing Motion to Lift the Anti-Suit Injunction and Stay Further Proceedings No . 2:17-cv-00653-JAM-EFB 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?