Harris v. David, et al.

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/13/17 ORDERING The court received plaintiffs December 6, 2017 letter 20 ,and the undersigned appreciates plaintiffs comments. However, it would be inappropriate for a judge to communicate ex parte with a litigant, especially where the litigant still has a case pending in federal court. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID HARRIS,

12

No. 2:17-cv-0665 KJN P
Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

O. DAVID, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. The court received plaintiff’s December 6,

18

2017 letter (ECF No. 20), and the undersigned appreciates plaintiff’s comments. However, it

19

would be inappropriate for a judge to communicate ex parte with a litigant, especially where the

20

litigant still has a case pending in federal court.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 13, 2017

23
24
25
26

/harr0665.apprec

27
28
1