Schmuckley v. Walgreen Co.
Filing
63
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/17/2017 DISCHARGING 60 Order to Show Cause. ORDERING the balance of the docket remain under seal pending further developments in the Wisconsin district court action. ORDERING Plaintiffs to provide a status report on the Wisconsin court's proceedings within 90 days of the date of this order, and every 90 days thereafter until relieved of the obligation by this court. (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR. et al.,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-00673-KJM-EFB
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER
WALGREEN CO.,
Defendant.
16
17
18
On May 16, 2017, this court ordered plaintiffs to show cause why, after unsealing
19
the first amended complaint and notice of intervention in this case, the balance of the docket
20
should remain under seal. ECF No. 60. On May 30, 2017, plaintiffs responded. ECF No. 62.
21
Plaintiffs state a portion of the original complaint in this case was severed and
22
transferred under seal in the Eastern District of Wisconsin where a related case is being litigated.
23
Id. at 2. On April 19, 2017, the Wisconsin district court ordered a redacted version of this
24
complaint be filed in that court. Id. A settlement reached between plaintiffs and Walgreen
25
dismisses all claims in this action except those severed and transferred to the Wisconsin district
26
court. Id. Plaintiff contends if the court unseals the balance of the docket, including the original
27
complaint, the Wisconsin claims would be made public, effectively harming the ongoing qui tam
28
investigation in the Wisconsin district court. Id.
1
1
The court finds this reason suffices to maintain the seal here for now. See U.S. ex
2
rel. Lee v. Horizon Wests, Inc., No. C 00-2921 SBA, 2006 WL 305966, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 8,
3
2006) (generally, “lifting the seal on the entire record is appropriate unless the government shows
4
that such disclosure would . . . jeopardize an ongoing investigation”). Accordingly, the court
5
ORDERS the balance of the docket remain under seal pending further developments in the
6
Wisconsin district court action. Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to provide a status report on the
7
Wisconsin court’s proceedings within 90 days of the date of this order, and every 90 days
8
thereafter until relieved of the obligation by this court. The order to show cause is hereby
9
DISCHARGED.
10
This order resolves ECF No. 60.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
DATED: July 17, 2017.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?