Ardds v. Constancio, et al.

Filing 47

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/12/2018 ORDERING that the court takes no action on plaintiff's recent filings as this case is now closed. Plaintiff is hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

ANTIONE L. ARDDS,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

No. 2:17-cv-0679-WBS-EFB P

v.

ORDER

F. CONSTANCIO, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15
16

After this civil rights action was closed pursuant to the parties’ stipulation of voluntary

17

dismissal with prejudice, see ECF Nos. 41, 42, plaintiff filed a declaration “in support [of] ex

18

parte motion and objection to magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations,” a declaration

19

“in support of notice to the office of the clerk,” and a declaration “in support of ex parte motion

20

and supported evidence exhibits to support needed temporary restraining order,” see ECF Nos.

21

44, 45, 46. The court takes no action on plaintiff’s filings as this case is now closed.1 Plaintiff is

22

hereby informed that the court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not

23

authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

24
25

So ordered.
Dated: July 12 2018.

26
27
28

1

To the extent plaintiff requests copies of this court’s prisoner civil rights complaint form
(ECF No. 45), however, the request will be granted.