Harris v. Fernan et al

Filing 19

ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 9/19/17, ADOPTING in FULL 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Plaintiff's 3 , 13 motions for injunctive relief are DENIED. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:17-cv-0680 GEB KJN P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

S. FERNAN, et al.,
Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 15, 2017, plaintiff filed a motion for

20

injunctive relief. On September 6, 2017, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was

21

granted thirty days in which to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 15.)

22

On August 29, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

23

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

24

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed objections to

25

the findings and recommendations in which he recounts his extensive and complex medical

26

history, and provides myriad medical records and other exhibits in support. (ECF No. 18.)

27
28

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
1

1

court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

2

analysis.

3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

4

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 29, 2017, are adopted in full; and

5

2. Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 3 & 13) are denied.

6

Dated: September 19, 2017

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2