Harris v. Fernan et al
Filing
85
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/18/2019 ADOPTING in full the Findings and Recommendations filed 11/07/2019 (ECF No. 79 ); and DENYING Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. [78). (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-00680-TLN-KJN
v.
ORDER
S. KERNAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff Wayde Hollis Harris (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed
17
18
this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
19
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On November 07, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 79.) Neither
23
party has filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.
Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.
24
25
United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
26
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
27
1983); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
28
///
1
1
2
Having reviewed the file under the applicable legal standards, the Court finds the Findings
and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 07, 2019 (ECF No. 79), are
5
adopted in full; and
6
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 78) is DENIED.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: December 18, 2019
9
10
11
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?