Harris v. Fernan et al

Filing 96

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/4/2020 ORDERING, within 14 days, plaintiff shall file with the court whatever information he has-allegedly confidential, modified documents, or otherwise. If the court finds it appropriate, the court might then order the information filed under seal. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0680 TLN KJN P v. ORDER S. KERNAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On October 29, 2020, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s 17 18 order filed October 7, 2020, finding discovery is closed following resolution of the pending 19 discovery disputes. In his request, plaintiff declares under penalty of perjury that subsequent to 20 plaintiff’s last filing and the court’s October 7, 2020 order, confidential “sources say the modified 21 documents have something written at the top of the pages.” (ECF No. 95 at 1-2.) Because 22 defendant failed to provide plaintiff with those pages, plaintiff states he cannot determine whether 23 the pages have been modified or not. (ECF No. 95 at 2.) Plaintiff seeks an in camera review of 24 his confidential information. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days from the date of this 25 26 order, plaintiff shall file with the court whatever information he has – allegedly confidential, 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 modified documents, or otherwise. If the court finds it appropriate, the court might then order the 2 information filed under seal. 3 Dated: November 4, 2020 4 5 /harr0680.icr.req 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?