Harris v. Fernan et al
Filing
96
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/4/2020 ORDERING, within 14 days, plaintiff shall file with the court whatever information he has-allegedly confidential, modified documents, or otherwise. If the court finds it appropriate, the court might then order the information filed under seal. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0680 TLN KJN P
v.
ORDER
S. KERNAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On October 29, 2020, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s
17
18
order filed October 7, 2020, finding discovery is closed following resolution of the pending
19
discovery disputes. In his request, plaintiff declares under penalty of perjury that subsequent to
20
plaintiff’s last filing and the court’s October 7, 2020 order, confidential “sources say the modified
21
documents have something written at the top of the pages.” (ECF No. 95 at 1-2.) Because
22
defendant failed to provide plaintiff with those pages, plaintiff states he cannot determine whether
23
the pages have been modified or not. (ECF No. 95 at 2.) Plaintiff seeks an in camera review of
24
his confidential information.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days from the date of this
25
26
order, plaintiff shall file with the court whatever information he has – allegedly confidential,
27
////
28
////
1
1
modified documents, or otherwise. If the court finds it appropriate, the court might then order the
2
information filed under seal.
3
Dated: November 4, 2020
4
5
/harr0680.icr.req
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?