Ortiz v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/20/2018 DENYING 54 Motion to Postpone Proceedings. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RENE ORTIZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-713-TLN-KJN PS
v.
ORDER
DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC., et
al.
Defendants.
16
17
Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to postpone any proceedings in the
18
19
case until July 18, 2018, due to plaintiff’s travel outside the United States. (ECF No. 54.)
At present, the court has issued findings and recommendations that the case be dismissed;
20
21
plaintiff, having already received an extension of time, has filed objections and amended
22
objections to the findings and recommendations; and defendants have filed a reply to plaintiff’s
23
objections. (ECF Nos. 47, 52, 53, 55.) As such, no further filings or actions from the parties are
24
required, or indeed, permitted, and the matter is ripe for resolution by the assigned district judge,
25
as his schedule permits. Consequently, there is no need for a postponement of any proceedings.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to postpone proceedings is DENIED.
2
This order resolves ECF No. 54.
3
Dated: June 20, 2018
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?