Ortiz v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.

Filing 56

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/20/2018 DENYING 54 Motion to Postpone Proceedings. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RENE ORTIZ, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-713-TLN-KJN PS v. ORDER DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC., et al. Defendants. 16 17 Presently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to postpone any proceedings in the 18 19 case until July 18, 2018, due to plaintiff’s travel outside the United States. (ECF No. 54.) At present, the court has issued findings and recommendations that the case be dismissed; 20 21 plaintiff, having already received an extension of time, has filed objections and amended 22 objections to the findings and recommendations; and defendants have filed a reply to plaintiff’s 23 objections. (ECF Nos. 47, 52, 53, 55.) As such, no further filings or actions from the parties are 24 required, or indeed, permitted, and the matter is ripe for resolution by the assigned district judge, 25 as his schedule permits. Consequently, there is no need for a postponement of any proceedings. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to postpone proceedings is DENIED. 2 This order resolves ECF No. 54. 3 Dated: June 20, 2018 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?