Belyew v. Lorman et al
Filing
48
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/08/18 GRANTING 43 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff is ordered to provide testimony at a deposition within 30 days. Defendant shall provide plaintiff with notice of the deposition as required by Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant may videotape the deposition. Plaintiffs request for a protective order is DENIED. Plaintiffs request that the transcript of the deposition be sealed is DENIED. Plaintiff request that the court order that plaintiff be provided a copy of the deposition transcript free of charge is DENIED. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LISA BELYEW,
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0723 MCE CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
LARRY LORMAN, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil
18
rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The only remaining defendant, defendant Lorman, is a Colusa
19
Police Officer.
20
On August 28, 2018, defendant filed a motion asking that the court compel plaintiff to
21
provide testimony at a deposition. Plaintiff’s original deposition was noticed for July 23, 2018 at
22
the Colusa County Jail, but plaintiff refused to testify. Defendant was explicitly granted
23
permission to depose plaintiff in the court’s March 27, 2018 Discovery and Scheduling Order
24
pursuant to Rule 30 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
25
Plaintiff opposes the motion to compel. Among other things, plaintiff feels that if she is
26
deposed, she will be denied the ability to personally appear and present her case at her trial since,
27
according to plaintiff, her deposition testimony could be used in lieu of live testimony. Plaintiff is
28
informed that while Federal Rule of Evidence 804 does permit the admission of deposition
1
1
testimony at a trial under certain circumstances, her deposition could not be used in lieu of
2
plaintiff’s live testimony in her case-in-chief against plaintiff’s wishes.
3
Plaintiff also asserts it is emotionally difficult for her to recount the events comprising her
4
remaining Fourth Amendment claim against defendant Lorman. While the court is sympathetic
5
to this assertion, it is not possible for plaintiff to remove herself from any discussion of the events
6
underlying her claim if she wishes to pursue it.1
7
Finally, plaintiff asks that the court issue a protective order, pursuant to Federal Rule of
8
Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(A) precluding defendant from deposing plaintiff. However, plaintiff
9
fails to point to any authority suggesting that rule provides a basis upon which the court may
10
preclude one party from deposing another, as opposed to merely limiting the questions which may
11
be asked. Even if the court had such authority, plaintiff has not shown her being deposed would
12
subject her to a level of hardship justifying the court’s preclusion of her being deposed.
13
Because plaintiff has failed to show good cause for her refusal to testify at a deposition,
14
she will be compelled to do so. If she refuses to testify a second time, plaintiff will be sanctioned,
15
most likely with dismissal of this action.
16
Plaintiff requests that the court seal the deposition transcript once the deposition is
17
complete. This request is premature. If, after the deposition, plaintiff has grounds to file a
18
motion to seal, she may make her request at that time.
19
Finally, plaintiff requests that the court order that plaintiff be provided a copy of the
20
transcript of her deposition pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(f)(3). That rule does
21
not provide a basis for ordering that plaintiff be provided a transcript of her deposition transcript
22
free of charge, nor does her status as a litigant proceeding in forma pauperis.
23
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. Defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 43) is granted.
25
26
27
Plaintiff indicates she “does not see how this deposition will help the defendant.” A purpose of
discovery, including depositions, is to make the parties aware of any potential evidence which
may be presented at trial so that they may adequately prepare for trial. Another purpose is to
provide parties with a thorough understanding of their respective cases permitting them to assess
whether settlement is appropriate and, if so, on what terms.
1
28
2
1
2. Plaintiff is ordered to provide testimony at a deposition within 30 days. Defendant
2
shall provide plaintiff with notice of the deposition as required by Rule 30(b) of the Federal Rules
3
of Civil Procedure. Defendant may videotape the deposition. Plaintiff’s refusal to be deposed
4
will result in sanctions, most likely dismissal.
5
3. Plaintiff’s request for a protective order is denied.
6
4. Plaintiff’s request that the transcript of the deposition be sealed is denied.
7
5. Plaintiff request that the court order that plaintiff be provided a copy of the deposition
8
transcript free of charge is denied.
9
Dated: November 8, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
bely0723.mtc
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?