Belyew v. Lorman et al
Filing
79
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 03/17/20 DENYING 78 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
LISA BELYEW,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0723 MCE CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
LARRY LORMAN, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff requests that the court
17
appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners
18
in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In
19
exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney to voluntarily represent such a
20
plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);
21
Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether
22
“exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider plaintiff’s likelihood of success on the
23
merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light of the complexity
24
of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009) (district court
25
did not abuse discretion in declining to appoint counsel). The burden of demonstrating
26
exceptional circumstances is on the plaintiff. Id. Circumstances common to most prisoners, such
27
as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not establish exceptional
28
circumstances that warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel.
1
Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has failed to
2
meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of
3
counsel at this time.
4
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of
5
counsel (ECF No. 78) is denied.
6
Dated: March 17, 2020
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
1/mp
bely0723.31
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?