Cabrera v. California Forensic Medical Group et al
Filing
7
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/21/2017 ORDERING Clerk of Court assign a District Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAFAEL CABRERA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-0743 CKD P
v.
ORDER AND
CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL
GROUP, et al.,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants
16
On May 11, 2017, the court ordered plaintiff to file a completed application to proceed in
17
18
forma pauperis within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a completed application to
19
proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days would result in dismissal.1 Plaintiff has not filed a
20
completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district
21
22
court judge to the case; and
23
/////
24
/////
25
1
26
27
28
The court’s docket reveals that the court’s May 11, 2017 order was returned to the court by the
U.S. Postal Service because plaintiff was released from the Butte County Jail. Plaintiff has not
provided the court with a new address. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court
apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents
at the record address of the party is fully effective.
1
1
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
2
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
3
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
4
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
5
with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings
6
and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified
7
time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153
8
(9th Cir. 1991).
9
Dated: June 21, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
1
cabr0743.fifp
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?