Cabrera v. California Forensic Medical Group et al

Filing 7

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/21/2017 ORDERING Clerk of Court assign a District Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAFAEL CABRERA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0743 CKD P v. ORDER AND CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants 16 On May 11, 2017, the court ordered plaintiff to file a completed application to proceed in 17 18 forma pauperis within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a completed application to 19 proceed in forma pauperis within 30 days would result in dismissal.1 Plaintiff has not filed a 20 completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 22 court judge to the case; and 23 ///// 24 ///// 25 1 26 27 28 The court’s docket reveals that the court’s May 11, 2017 order was returned to the court by the U.S. Postal Service because plaintiff was released from the Butte County Jail. Plaintiff has not provided the court with a new address. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. 1 1 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 3 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 4 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 5 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 6 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 7 time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 8 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: June 21, 2017 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 cabr0743.fifp 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?