Sermeno v. Irmer, et al.

Filing 4

ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 04/06/2017. Old Case Number: 1:16-cv-01583 AWI SKO. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 LARRY A. SERMENO, Plaintiff, 15 16 v. 17 Case No. 1:16-cv-01583-AWI-SKO ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA M. IRMER, et al., 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. _____________________________________/ On October 20, 2016, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against M. Irmer, Kimberly Flener, A. Irmer, and “Jane Doe,” all of whom are alleged to be employees of Butte County Superior Court, located in Chico, California. (Doc. 1.) According to Plaintiff, the events giving rise to his complaint occurred in Chico, which is in Butte County. (See Doc. 1, p. 2.) Pursuant to this Court’s Local Rule 120(d), civil actions arising in Butte County shall be commenced in the U.S. District Court sitting in Sacramento, California. Local Rule 120(f) provides that “[w]henever in any action the Court finds upon its own motion, motion of any party, or stipulation that the action has not been commenced in the proper court in accordance with this 1 Rule, or for other good cause, the Court may transfer the action to another venue within the 2 District. Because the events underlying Plaintiff’s complaint occurred in the Sacramento Division 3 of the Eastern District, the Court on its own motion transfers this case pursuant to Local Rule 4 120(f). 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be transferred to the Sacramento 6 Division of the Eastern District of California. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: 10 April 6, 2017 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?