Falla v. Rackley

Filing 22

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/13/2017 GRANTING 20 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent to file responsive pleading by or on 7/12/2017 and file a separate response addressing the merits of Petitioner's 18 Motion to Stay Action. Petitioner's response to Respondent's responsive pleading to be filed within 30 days after service. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BENDY FALLA, 12 Petitioner, v. 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-00747 AC P [PROPOSED] ORDER RON RACKLEY, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent’s request for an 19 extension of time, up to and including July 12, 2017, to file a responsive pleading in this matter, 20 is GRANTED. See ECF No. 20. 21 If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed 22 and served within thirty days after service of the answer. Alternatively, if the response to the 23 habeas petition is a motion, petitioner’s opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion 24 shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the motion, and respondent’s reply, if 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 1 1 2 any, shall be filed and served within fourteen days thereafter. When respondent files his answer or motion, he shall also file a separate response 3 addressing the merits of petitioner’s recently-filed motion to stay this action. See ECF No. 18. 4 Petitioner may file a reply within fourteen days after service of respondent’s response. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 13, 2017 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?