Clark v. Fields
Filing
3
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/17/2017 REMANDING CASE to Solano County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court; DENYING as MOOT 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. CASE CLOSED (Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CHOYLA CLARK,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-00758-KJM-KJN
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CASSANDRA FIELDS,
Defendant.
16
17
18
The issue in this case is unlawful detainer, with an amount in controversy of less
19
than $1,000. See ECF No. 1. On April 10, 2017, defendant Cassandra Fields removed this case
20
from state court to federal court. Id. Additionally, defendant filed a motion to proceed in forma
21
pauperis (IFP). ECF No. 2.
22
When a case “of which the district courts of the United States have original
23
jurisdiction” is initially brought in state court, a defendant may remove it to federal court.
24
28 U.S.C. § 1441(a). There are two bases for federal subject matter jurisdiction: (1) federal
25
question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and (2) diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
26
§ 1332. A federal district court may remand a case sua sponte where a defendant has not
27
established federal jurisdiction. See Enrich v. Touche Ross & Co., 846 F.2d 1190, 1195 (9th Cir.
28
1988) (citing Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co., 257 U.S. 92, 97 (1921)). “If at any time
1
1
before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case
2
shall be remanded.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).
3
Here, the court finds the case should be remanded to the Solano County Superior
4
Court. Because the amount in controversy is less than $75,000, and the main issue turns on state
5
law, removal is improper because this court does not have subject matter jurisdiction under 28
6
U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1441.
7
I.
8
9
10
11
CONCLUSION
This case is remanded to Solano County Superior Court. Defendant’s IFP motion
is DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 17, 2017
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?