Miller v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Filing
29
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/8/2020 ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations in full. Defendants' unopposed 24 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JESSE FRANCIS MILLER, SR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-CV-0759-KJM-DMC
v.
ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. The matter was
18
19
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local
20
rules.
21
On November 1, 2019, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,
22
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
23
within the time specified therein. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been
24
filed.
25
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
26
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
27
reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations
28
of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate]
1
1
court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be
2
supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1.
The findings and recommendations filed November 1, 2019, are adopted in
2.
Defendants’ unopposed motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 24) is
3.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.
5
full;
6
7
8
9
granted; and
DATED: January 8, 2020.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?