Miller v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 2/19/2019 DIRECTING the Clerk to issue forthwith. SERVICE IS APPROPRIATE for defendants: Department of Veterans Affairs. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to supply the USM with the necessary forms within 15 days from the date of this order and the USM shall service process within 60 days of the date of this order. (Huang, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JESSE FRANCIS MILLER, SR.,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:17-CV-0759-KJM-DMC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS,
Defendant.
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the
court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (Doc. 5).
The court is required to screen complaints brought by litigants who have been
21
granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Under this screening
22
provision, the court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if it: (1) is frivolous or malicious;
23
(2) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief from a
24
defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(A), (B). Moreover,
25
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3), this court must dismiss an action if the court
26
determines that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Because plaintiff has been granted leave to
27
proceed in forma pauperis, the court will screen the complaint pursuant to § 1915(e)(2). Pursuant
28
to Rule 12(h)(3), the court will also consider as a threshold matter whether it has subject-matter
1
1
jurisdiction.
2
Plaintiff claims George W. Chiu, M.D., a doctor with defendant Department of
3
Veterans Affairs, showed “absolute disregard in performing prostate surgery. . . .” The court
4
concludes that it has subject matter jurisdiction and that the complaint is appropriate for service
5
by the United States Marshal without pre-payment of costs. If plaintiff desires service of process
6
by the United States Marshal without pre-payment of costs, plaintiff must comply with the
7
requirements outlined below. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with this order, or
8
otherwise effect service pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, may result in dismissal of
9
the action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local
10
Rule 110.
11
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
12
1.
The Clerk of the Court shall issue a summons in a civil case, the
13
undersigned’s new case documents, and an order setting this matter for an initial scheduling
14
conference;
15
16
17
2.
The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff the summons, one USM-285
forms, and a copy of the complaint;
3.
Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the
18
summons by indicating the addresses of the named defendants and shall submit to the United
19
States Marshal at the address indicated below the following documents:
20
a.
The completed summons;
21
b.
One completed USM-285 form for each named defendant;
22
c.
Two copies of the complaint; and
23
d.
One copy of the court’s initial scheduling conference order issued
herewith;
24
25
4.
Within 20 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a notice
26
indicating that the documents described above have been submitted to the United States Marshal,
27
or a notice that plaintiff intends to serve the summons and complaint without assistance from the
28
United States Marshal;
2
1
5.
If plaintiff seeks the assistance of the United States Marshal, the United
2
States Marshal is directed to serve all process without pre-payment of costs not later than 60 days
3
from the date of this order, such service of process to be completed by serving a copy of the
4
summons, complaint, and initial scheduling conference order on the defendants at the addresses
5
provided by plaintiff; and
6
7
6.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the
United States Marshal at 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, CA, 95814.
8
9
10
Dated: February 19, 2019
____________________________________
DENNIS M. COTA
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?