Bochene v. MFRA Trust 2014-2, MF Residential Accets, LLC, et al
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/5/2018 ADOPTING IN FULL 30 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 18 Motion to Dismiss; DISMISSING the claims against Defendant Capital One Bank without leave to amend; DISMISSING Capital One Bank from this action. (Michel, G.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY BOCHENE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-00768-TLN-DB PS
v.
ORDER
MFRA TRUST 2014-2,
MFRESIDENTIALASSETS, LLC AS
ADMINISTRATOR, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a
18
19
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On January 24, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein,
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings and
23
recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and no party has filed objections to the
24
findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
26
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 24, 2018 (ECF No. 30), are adopted
3
4
5
6
7
8
in full;
2. Defendant Capital One Bank’s June 29, 2017 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 18) is
granted;
3. The complaint’s claims against Defendant Capital One Bank are dismissed without
leave to amend; and
4. Defendant Capital One Bank is dismissed from this action.
9
10
Dated: March 5, 2018
11
12
13
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?