Bochene v. MFRA Trust 2014-2, MF Residential Accets, LLC, et al

Filing 47

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/2/18 ORDERING that Plaintiff SHOW CAUSE in writing within 14 days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Status Confer ence is CONTINUED to 11/2/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before 10/19/18 and and defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before 10/26/18. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY BOCHENE, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:17-cv-0768 TLN DB PS v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE MFRA TRUST 2014-2, MFRESIDENTIALASSETS, LLC AS ADMINISTRATOR, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Anthony Bochene is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 18 19 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On July 13, 2018, the undersigned issued an order setting this matter for a status 20 21 conference on August 24, 2018. (ECF No. 40.) Pursuant to the order plaintiff was to file a status 22 report on or before August 10, 2018. (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff, however, failed to file a timely status 23 report. 24 Accordingly, on August 17, 2018, the undersigned issued an order to show cause as to 25 why this action should not be dismissed due to plaintiff’s lack of prosecution. (ECF No. 41.) 26 That order also continued the August 24, 2018 status conference to October 5, 2018, and ordered 27 plaintiff to file a status report on or before September 21, 2018. On September 4, 2018, plaintiff 28 filed a letter apologizing for failing to file a timely status report on or before August 10, 2018. 1 1 (ECF No. 45.) Despite this apology, plaintiff again failed to file a timely status report on or 2 before September 21, 2018. The failure of a party to comply with the Local Rules or any order of the court “may be 3 4 grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or 5 within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. Any individual representing himself or 6 herself without an attorney is bound by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules, and 7 all applicable law. Local Rule 183(a). Failure to comply with applicable rules and law may be 8 grounds for dismissal or any other sanction appropriate under the Local Rules. Id. In light of plaintiff’s pro se status, plaintiff’s September 4, 2018 letter, and in the interests 9 10 of justice, the court will provide plaintiff with a final opportunity to show good cause for 11 plaintiff’s conduct. This is not the first-time plaintiff’s failure to prosecute has delayed this 12 action. (ECF Nos. 14, 36, 41.) Plaintiff’s failure to timely comply with this order will result in 13 the recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 14 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 15 1. Plaintiff show cause in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order as to why 16 this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution.1 17 2. The October 5, 2018 status conference is continued to Friday, November 2, 2018, at 18 10:00 a.m. at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in Courtroom 19 No. 27 before the undersigned. 20 3. All parties are required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, if 21 proceeding in propria persona, on his or her own behalf. Any party may appear at the status 22 conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the 23 courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours 24 before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a party may not appear telephonically over a 25 cellphone. 26 27 28 1 Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this civil action, plaintiff may comply with this order by filing a request for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 1 4. Plaintiff shall file and serve a status report on or before October 19, 2018, and 2 defendant shall file and serve a status report on or before October 26, 2018. Each party’s status 3 report shall address all of the following matters: 4 a. Progress of service of process; 5 b. Possible joinder of additional parties; 6 c. Possible amendment of the pleadings; 7 d. Jurisdiction and venue; 8 e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof; 9 f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of expert witnesses; g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial conference and trial; h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity or complexity of the action; i. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in bankruptcy; j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of her so acting, or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference before another magistrate judge; k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge; and l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious disposition of this action. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 5. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file a timely status report, or failure to appear at the 22 status conference either in person or telephonically, may result in a recommendation that this 23 action be dismissed for lack of prosecution and as a sanction for failure to comply with court 24 orders and applicable rules. See Local Rules 110 and 183. 25 Dated: October 2, 2018 26 27 28 DLB:6 DB\orders\orders.pro se\bochene0768.osc4 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?