Benson v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.

Filing 7

STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/31/17. Defendant's responsive pleading is now due 6/9/2017.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
John S. Battenfeld, Bar No. 119513
[e-mail]
300 South Grand Avenue
Twenty-Second Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3132
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Shannon B. Nakabayashi, Bar No. 215469
[e-mail]
Mariko Mae Ashley, Bar No. 311897
[e-mail]
One Market, Spear Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

HAYES PAWLENKO LLP
Matthew B. Hayes (SBN 220639)
[e-mail]
Kye D. Pawlenko (SBN 221475)
[e-mail]
595 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 303
Pasadena, CA 91101
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LORETTA JEAN BENSON

Attorneys for Defendants
MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17

LORETTA JEAN BENSON, an individual on
behalf of herself and others similarly situated

18

Plaintiffs,

19
20
21

vs.

Case No. 2:17-cv-00771-MCE-EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.;
and DOES 1 to 10 inclusive,
Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
A TTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS A NGELES

DB1/ 92393590.1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
2:17-CV-00771-MCE-EFB

1

Pursuant to U.S.D.C. Eastern District Local Rule 144(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, Plaintiff

2

Loretta Jean Benson (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Defendant”)

3

have stipulated and agreed and hereby submit their stipulation to extend the time for Defendants

4

to file their response to Plaintiffs’ Complaint.

5

Defendant was served with the Complaint on or about April 12, 2017. Defendant’s

6

counsel previously obtained an extension until May 31, 2017 to respond to the Complaint.

7

Defendant’s investigation into the allegations in the Complaint is continuing and the parties have

8

stipulated that Defendant may have additional time, or until June 9, 2017 to respond.

9
10

Dated: May 31, 2017

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

11
12

By

13
14

/s/ Shannon B. Nakabayashi
Shannon B. Nakabayashi
Attorneys for Defendant
MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES,
INC.

15
16

Dated: May 31, 2017

HAYES PAWLENKO LLP

17
By

18
19

/s/ Kye Pawlenko
Kye Pawlenko
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LORETTA JEAN BENSON

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP

2

A TTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS A NGELES

DB1/ 92393590.1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
2:17-CV-00771-MCE-EFB

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

LORETTA JEAN BENSON, an individual on
behalf of herself and others similarly situated

12

15

ORDER

Plaintiffs,

13
14

Case No. 2:17-cv-00771-MCE-EFB

vs.
MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.;
and DOES 1 to 10 inclusive,
Defendants.

16
17

For good cause show, the Court hereby orders that the parties’ Stipulation to Extend Time

18
19
20
21
22

to Respond to the Complaint is GRANTED. Defendant’s responsive pleading is now due June 9,
2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 31, 2017

23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP

3

A TTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS A NGELES

DB1/ 92393590.1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
2:17-CV-00771-MCE-EFB