Peterson v. Hatton

Filing 12

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/20/18 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 2/23/18 11 are ADOPTED IN FULL; and Petitioner's 2/12/18 Application for Certificate of Appealability ]10] is DENIED as unnecessary. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PHILLIP ANTHONY PETERSON, 12 13 14 No. 2:17-cv-0785 MCE DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER S. HATTON, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 23, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 11. Petitioner 23 has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 26 ORDERED that: 27 28 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 23, 2018 (ECF No. 11) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 1 1 2 3 4 2. Petitioner’s February 12, 2018 Application for Certificate of Appealability (ECF No. 10) is DENIED as unnecessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 20, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 DLB:9 Pete0785.800.hc(2) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?