Arismendez v. Muniz

Filing 18

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/13/18 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 5/7/18 (ECF No. 17 ), are ADOPTED in full; Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 12 , is GRANTED; Petitioner's m otion to voluntarily dismiss the unexhausted claims in his federal habeas corpus application, ECF No. 15 , is DENIED as moot; Petitioner's federal habeas corpus application, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED without prejudice to filing an amended pet ition within 30 days on the court approved form; Any amended petition must be filed on the form employed by this court and must state all claims and prayers for relief on the form. It must bear the case number assigned to this action and must contain the title "Amended Petition"; the Clerk is directed to send petitioner a new habeas corpus application form. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROLANDO ARISMENDEZ,

12

Petitioner,

13
14
15

v.

No. 2:17-cv-00792 MCE CKD P

ORDER

DAVID BAUGHMAN,
Respondent.

16
17

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas

18

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

19

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On May 7, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

21

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

22

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

25

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having

27

reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record

28

and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 7, 2018 (ECF No. 17), are ADOPTED in

3

full;

4

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 12, is GRANTED.

5

3. Petitioner’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the unexhausted claims in his federal habeas

6

corpus application, ECF No. 15, is DENIED as moot.

7
8

4. Petitioner’s federal habeas corpus application, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED without
prejudice to filing an amended petition within 30 days on the court approved form.

9

5. Any amended petition must be filed on the form employed by this court and must state

10

all claims and prayers for relief on the form. It must bear the case number assigned to this action

11

and must contain the title “Amended Petition.”

12
13
14
15

6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a new habeas corpus application
form.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 13, 2018

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2