Arismendez v. Muniz
Filing
18
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/13/18 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 5/7/18 (ECF No. 17 ), are ADOPTED in full; Respondent's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 12 , is GRANTED; Petitioner's m otion to voluntarily dismiss the unexhausted claims in his federal habeas corpus application, ECF No. 15 , is DENIED as moot; Petitioner's federal habeas corpus application, ECF No. 1 , is DISMISSED without prejudice to filing an amended pet ition within 30 days on the court approved form; Any amended petition must be filed on the form employed by this court and must state all claims and prayers for relief on the form. It must bear the case number assigned to this action and must contain the title "Amended Petition"; the Clerk is directed to send petitioner a new habeas corpus application form. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROLANDO ARISMENDEZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
v.
No. 2:17-cv-00792 MCE CKD P
ORDER
DAVID BAUGHMAN,
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On May 7, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
25
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
26
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having
27
reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record
28
and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 7, 2018 (ECF No. 17), are ADOPTED in
3
full;
4
2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 12, is GRANTED.
5
3. Petitioner’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the unexhausted claims in his federal habeas
6
corpus application, ECF No. 15, is DENIED as moot.
7
8
4. Petitioner’s federal habeas corpus application, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED without
prejudice to filing an amended petition within 30 days on the court approved form.
9
5. Any amended petition must be filed on the form employed by this court and must state
10
all claims and prayers for relief on the form. It must bear the case number assigned to this action
11
and must contain the title “Amended Petition.”
12
13
14
15
6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a new habeas corpus application
form.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 13, 2018
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?