Arismendez v. Muniz
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/12/2018 GRANTING petitioner 30 days to file an amended federal habeas petition on the court-approved form. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROLANDO ARISMENDEZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
No. 2:17-cv-00792 MCE CKD P
ORDER
DAVID BAUGHMAN,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action for habeas corpus relief
17
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 15, 2018, the district judge assigned to this case adopted
19
the prior Findings and Recommendations and dismissed petitioner’s federal habeas application
20
without prejudice to filing an amended petition within 30 days. To date, petitioner has not
21
responded to the court’s order or filed an amended federal habeas petition. The court will sua
22
sponte grant petitioner a 30 day extension of time to file an amended habeas petition.1 Petitioner
23
is advised that his failure to file an amended federal habeas petition within the timeframe
24
provided will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed and the case closed.
25
/////
26
/////
27
28
1
The court expresses no opinion on the timeliness of any amended federal habeas petition
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner is granted 30 days from the date
2
of this order to file an amended federal habeas petition on the court-approved form.
3
Dated: September 12, 2018
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
12/aris0792.eot.docx
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?