Arismendez v. Muniz
Filing
31
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/08/20 ORDERING petitioner show cause why the stay of this case should not be lifted within 30 days from the date of this order by demonstrating what steps he has taken to exhaus t his state court remedies. In the event that petitioner fails to respond to this order, the court will lift the stay of this federal habeas proceeding and set a briefing schedule on the 3 claims presented in his first amended habeas corpus petition. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROLANDO ARISMENDEZ,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
v.
No. 2:17-cv-00792-MCE-CKD (HC)
ORDER
DAVID BAUGHMAN,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this habeas corpus action filed
17
18
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. On March 25, 2020, the court stayed these proceedings to permit
19
petitioner to exhaust available state court remedies. ECF No. 30. By the same order, petitioner
20
was directed to file a status report every 90 days indicating what efforts he has taken to exhaust
21
his state court remedies. To date, petitioner has not filed any status report.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.
Petitioner show cause why the stay of this case should not be lifted within 30 days
24
from the date of this order by demonstrating what steps he has taken to exhaust his
25
state court remedies.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
2. In the event that petitioner fails to respond to this order, the court will lift the stay of
2
this federal habeas proceeding and set a briefing schedule on the three claims
3
presented in his first amended habeas corpus petition.
4
Dated: September 8, 2020
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
12/aris0792.osc.stay.docx
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?