Leonard v. Davis
Filing
59
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/17/19 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 4/23/19 (ECF No. 58 ), in full; GRANTING Petitioner's motion for stay and abeyance (ECF No. 49 ); DENYING Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 51 ) as moot; and the Petitioner shall file his state exhaustion petition no later than forty-five days after the filing of this order. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERIC ROYCE LEONARD,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-0796 JAM AC DP
v.
ORDER
RON DAVIS,
15
Respondent.
16
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ
17
18
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States
19
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 23, 2019, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 58. Neither party
23
has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 23, 2019 (ECF No. 58), are adopted in
27
28
full;
1
1
2. Petitioner’s motion for stay and abeyance (ECF No. 49) is granted.
2
3. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 51) is denied as moot.
3
4. Petitioner shall file his state exhaustion petition no later than forty-five days after the
4
filing of this order.
5
6
7
8
DATED: May 17, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?