Dupree, Jr. v. Intel Satellite Organization
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/27/2017 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff to pay the $400 filing fee no later than 14 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RICHARD JOSE DUPREE, JR.,
No. 2:17-cv-0803 CKD P
INTEL SATELLITE ORGANIZATION,
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983 along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a),
28 U.S.C. § 1915 permits any court of the United States to authorize the commencement
and prosecution of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person who submits an affidavit
indicating that the person is unable to pay such fees. However,
[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a
judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the
prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or
detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the
United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous,
malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
Court records indicate that plaintiff has been deemed a “Three Strikes” inmate under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g). Dupree v. U. S. Copyright Office, No. 2:11-cv-1700 WBS KJN, Order dated
July 28, 2011 (adopting June 30, 2011 findings and recommendations and deeming dismissal for
frivolousness plaintiff’s third strike). The court takes judicial notice of the two other cases
identified therein as § 1915(g) strikes against plaintiff, which were dismissed as frivolous or for
failure to state a claim.1
The imminent danger applies only if it is clear that the danger existed when the complaint
was filed. Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 (9th Cir. 2007). Allegations of imminent
danger that are overly speculative or fanciful may be rejected. Id. at 1057, n.11. Having
reviewed the complaint, the undersigned finds that plaintiff has not credibly alleged “imminent
danger of serious physical injury” under § 1915(g).
In light of the above, plaintiff will be granted fourteen days to pay the filing fee in this
action; otherwise, it will be dismissed.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is denied; and
2. Plaintiff shall pay the $400 filing fee no later than fourteen days from the date of this
order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action.
Dated: April 27, 2017
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2 / dupr0803.threestrikes
Dupree v. United States District Court, No. 2:11-cv-0263 DAD (ECF No. 10); Dupree v.
Santiago, et al., No. 2:11-cv-0309 EFB (ECF No. 7).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?