City of Los Angeles, et al. v. Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al.

Filing 102

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/13/19 GRANTING Sprint until 30 days after the filing of the Amended Consolidated Complaint to file an Answer or until 12/13/19 if plaintiff does not file an Amended Complaint. (Coll, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Colin H. Murray (State Bar No. 159142)
[e-mail]
Anne M. Kelts (State Bar No. 298710)
[e-mail]
BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3802
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
John E. Joiner (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
William P. Ashworth (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and
NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
[Additional counsel on signature page]

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

16
17
18

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ex rel. RICHARD
KNUDSEN,

19
20
21
22

Case No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC
Date Action Was Transferred from
Central District of California:
April 18, 2017

Plaintiffs,
vs.
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.; NEXTEL OF
CALIFORNIA, INC., D/B/A NEXTEL
COMMUNICATIONS AND SPRINT
NEXTEL; and DOES 1-10,

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER
EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND
Judge:
Hon. Troy L. Nunley
Courtroom: 2, 15th Floor

23
Trial Date: None set
24

Defendants.

25
26
27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
Two Embarcadero Center,
11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone]

Case No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

1

WHEREAS on October 29, 2019, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Motion to

2

Dismiss Plaintiff City of Los Angeles’s Consolidated Complaint in Intervention filed by Defendants

3

Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Nextel of California, Inc., D/B/A Nextel Communications and Sprint

4

Nextel (hereinafter “Sprint”) (Order of ECF No. 99); and

5

WHEREAS on November 7, 2019, the Court entered a Minute Order on the Docket

6

directing that “Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s order [on the

7

Motion to Dismiss] not later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this Minute Order”;

8

WHEREAS this is the second Stipulation in the case requesting an extension of time to

9

respond to the complaint, the first such stipulation having been filed on December 1, 2016, and

10
11
12
13

granted by order of December 5, 2016;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties and their undersigned counsel
that the time for Sprint to respond be and hereby is extended as follows:
1. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint in compliance with the Court’s minute order,

14

Sprint shall answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Amended Consolidated

15

Complaint in Intervention by no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the filing

16

of the Amended Consolidated Complaint in Intervention.

17
18

2. If Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint, Sprint shall answer the Consolidated
Complaint in Intervention by no later than December 13, 2019.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
Two Embarcadero Center,
11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone]

1
Case No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

1

Dated: November 12, 2019

BAKER & McKENZIE LLP
Colin H. Murray
Anne M. Kelts

2

ERISE IP, P.A.
Mark McGrory

3
4

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
John E. Joiner
William P. Ashworth

5
6

By: /s/ William P. Ashworth
William P. Ashworth

7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
Sprint Solutions, Inc. and
Nextel of California, Inc.

9
10
Dated: November 12, 2019

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY LLP
Niall P. McCarthy
Eric J. Buescher

11
12
13

By: /s/ Eric J. Buescher
Eric J. Buescher

14

Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Los Angeles

15
16
17
18
19
20

ATTESTATION
I, William P. Ashworth, attest that I am one of the attorneys for the Sprint Defendants, and as
the ECF user and filer of this document, I attest that the authorization and the concurrence in the
filing of this document were obtained from its signatories on November 12, 2019.

21
22

Date: November 12, 2019

/s/ William P. Ashworth
William P. Ashworth

23
24
25
26
27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
Two Embarcadero Center,
11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone]

2
Case No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

1
2

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ex rel. RICHARD KNUDSEN v. SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.,
U.S. District Court For The Eastern District Of California - Case No. 2:17-CV-0811-TLN-AC

3
ORDER
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Date: November 13, 2019
7

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Baker & McKenzie LLP
Two Embarcadero Center,
11th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone]

3
Case No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND