City of Los Angeles, et al. v. Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al.

Filing 113

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/2/21 AMENDING the pretrial scheduling order as follows: Close of Fact Discovery: 11/17/21; Opening expert reports: 12/17/21; Responsive expert reports: 2/1/22; Close of expert discovery: 3/1/22; Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline: 5/5/22. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Colin H. Murray (State Bar No. 159142) colin.murray@bakermckenzie.com Anne M. Kelts (State Bar No. 298710) anne.kelts@bakermckenzie.com BAKER & McKENZIE LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 11th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3802 Telephone: +1 415 576 3000 Facsimile: +1 415 576 3099 John E. Joiner (admitted Pro Hac Vice) jjoiner@wc.com William P. Ashworth (admitted Pro Hac Vice) washworth@wc.com Anna K. Tsiotsias (State Bar No. 319520) atsiotsias@wc.com WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 Telephone: +1 202 434 5000 Facsimile: +1 202 434 5029 Attorneys for Defendants SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC. [Additional counsel on signature page] 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 17 18 19 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ex rel. RICHARD KNUDSEN, 20 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER vs. SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC.; NEXTEL OF CALIFORNIA, INC., D/B/A NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS AND SPRINT NEXTEL; and DOES 1-10, Judge: Hon. Troy L. Nunley Courtroom: 2, 15th Floor Trial Date: None set Defendants. 26 27 28 Case No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING CASE SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 WHEREAS on April 28, 2020 the Court entered a Pretrial Scheduling Order setting the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines for the above-captioned case; WHEREAS, document production in this matter involves locating, reviewing and producing over 13 years of records from the parties as well as substantial third-party discovery; WHEREAS, the parties have worked diligently to move discovery forward, and have made substantial progress, but need more time to complete discovery due to the ongoing impact of the COVID-19 pandemic; WHEREAS, the parties have also discussed ways to streamline the cost and expense of the expert reports in this litigation and believe bifurcating damages quantification analysis will assist them in preparing dispositive motions in a cost effective manner and in pursuing potential resolution of these claims; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties and their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that the pretrial scheduling order will be modified as follows: 16 17 Event Deadline Close of Fact Discovery November 17, 2021 December 17, 2021 22 Opening expert reports for parties with the burden of proof (excluding reports related to the quantification of damages) Responsive expert reports (excluding reports related to the quantification of damages) Close of expert discovery 23 Dispositive Motion Hearing Deadline 18 19 20 21 February 1, 2022 March 1, 2022 May 5, 2022 24 25 Expert disclosures and discovery related to the quantification of damages Following the Court’s Ruling on Motions for Summary Judgment 26 27 28 1 Case No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER 1 Dated: April 2, 2021 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP Colin H. Murray Anne M. Kelts 2 WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP John E. Joiner William P. Ashworth 3 4 By: /s/ William P. Ashworth William P. Ashworth 5 6 Attorneys for Defendants Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Nextel of California, Inc. 7 8 9 Dated: April 2, 2021 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY LLP Niall P. McCarthy Eric J. Buescher 10 11 By: /s/ Eric J. Buescher Eric J. Buescher 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff City of Los Angeles 13 14 ORDER 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: April 2, 2021 17 18 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 2:17-cv-00811-TLN-AC STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?