Bejarano v. Baughman, et al.

Filing 7

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/26/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOBBY BEJARANO, 12 13 No. 2:17-cv-0812 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed June 12, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma 18 pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement or pay the $400 filing 19 fee in full. He was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this 20 action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to 21 the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. 22 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 27 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 28 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 1 1 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 2 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 3 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 4 Dated: July 26, 2017 5 6 7 8 9 /DLB7; DB/Inbox/Routine/beja0812.fifp 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?