Bejarano v. Baughman, et al.

Filing 7

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/26/2017 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BOBBY BEJARANO,

12
13

No. 2:17-cv-0812 JAM DB P

Plaintiff,
v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

14

DAVID BAUGHMAN, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

By an order filed June 12, 2017, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma

18

pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement or pay the $400 filing

19

fee in full. He was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this

20

action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to

21

the court’s order and has not filed the required documents.

22
23

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be
dismissed without prejudice.

24

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

25

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

26

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

27

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

28

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
1

1

objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The

2

parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to

3

appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

Dated: July 26, 2017

5
6
7
8
9

/DLB7;
DB/Inbox/Routine/beja0812.fifp

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2