Pruitt v. Genentech, Inc.

Filing 64

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 12/19/2018 GRANTING 63 Request to Seal. Within 7 days of entry of this Order, Plaintiff to submit to the Clerk copies of all documents encompassed by this Order for filing under seal pursuant to Local Rule 141(e)(2), and shall file on the public docket versions of the proposed redacted documents that Plaintiff lodged with its Request, with redactions applied. (Henshaw, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Jean K. Hyams (SBN 144425)
LEVY VINICK BURRELL HYAMS LLP
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300
Oakland, CA 94612
Tel.: [phone]
[e-mail]
Sean D. McHenry (SBN 284175)
MCHENRY LAW FIRM
201 Spear St., Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel.: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TIMOTHY PRUITT

11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

Case No. 2:17-CV-00822-JAM-AC

TIMOTHY PRUITT,

15

Plaintiff,

16

vs.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

GENENTECH, INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
TIMOTHY PRUITT’S REQUEST TO
SEAL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
GENENTECH, INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Date: January 8, 2019
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom: 6 – 14th Floor
Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez
Complaint filed: March 10, 2017
Trial date: April 1, 2019

26
27
28

Case No. 2:17-CV-00822-JAM-AC
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Request to Seal Documents Submitted in Support of
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment

1

Having considered Plaintiff Timothy Pruitt’s (“Plaintiff”) Request to Seal Documents

2

Submitted in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant Genentech, Inc.’s Motion for Summary

3

Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (Plaintiff’s “Request”), the materials

4

lodged therewith, and the other papers and pleadings on file herein, the Court hereby finds that there

5

are compelling reasons to grant Plaintiff’s Request.

6

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Request is GRANTED, as follows.

7

The following documents may be filed on the public docket with redactions, as reflected in

8

the proposed redacted documents lodged with Plaintiff’s Request, while the unredacted versions

9

shall be permanently sealed:

10



The Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to

11

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary

12

Judgment

13



14
15

Plaintiff’s Statement of Disputed Facts in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment



Plaintiff’s Responses to Defendant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of

16

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary

17

Judgment

18



19
20

Sean McHenry’s Declaration in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment,
or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment



Plaintiff Timothy Pruitt’s Declaration in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary

21

Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment

22

Within seven (7) days of entry of this Order, Plaintiff shall submit to the Clerk copies of all

23

of the documents encompassed by this Order for filing under seal pursuant to Local Rule 141(e)(2),

24

and shall file on the public docket versions of the proposed redacted documents that Plaintiff lodged

25

with its Request, with redactions applied.

26
27
28

1
Case No. 2:17-CV-00822-JAM-AC
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Request to Seal Documents Submitted in Support of
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

Dated: 12/19/2018

3

/s/ John A. Mendez
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No. 2:17-CV-00822-JAM-AC
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiff’s Request to Seal Documents Submitted in Support of
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment