Pruitt v. Genentech, Inc.

Filing 70

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/2/2019 GRANTING 67 Request to Seal Documents. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

LYNNE C. HERMLE (STATE BAR NO. 99779)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015
Telephone:
650 614 7400
Facsimile:
650 614 7401
JULIE A. TOTTEN (STATE BAR NO. 166470)
[e-mail]
LEO MONIZ (STATE BAR NO. 285571)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 3000
Sacramento, CA 95814-4497
Telephone:
916 447 9200
Facsimile:
916 329 4900
Attorneys for Defendant
GENENTECH, INC.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15

TIMOTHY PRUITT,

16
17
18

Plaintiff,
v.
GENENTECH, INC.; AND DOES 1
THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,

19
Defendants.

Case No. 2:17-CV-00822-JAM-AC
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
GENENTECH, INC.’s REQUEST TO
SEAL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED IN
SUPPORT OF REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

20
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:

21
22
23

January 8, 2019
1:30 p.m.
6, 14th floor
Hon. John A. Mendez

Date Action Filed: April 19, 2017
Trial Date: April 1, 2019

24
25
26
27
28
4128-2584-9625

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
GENENTECH’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00822-JAM-AC

1

Having considered Defendant Genentech, Inc.’s (“Genentech”) Request to Seal

2

Documents Submitted in Support of Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in

3

the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (Genentech’s “Request”), the materials lodged

4

therewith, and the other papers and pleadings on file herein, the Court hereby finds that there are

5

compelling reasons to grant Genentech’s Request.

6

Accordingly, Genentech’s Request is GRANTED, as follows. The following documents,

7

which Genentech lodged with its Request, may be filed on the public docket with redactions, as

8

reflected in the proposed redacted documents lodged with Genentech’s Request, while the

9

unredacted versions shall be permanently sealed:

10



11
12

Defendant Genentech, Inc.’s Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, or,
in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment;



Defendant Genentech, Inc.’s Response to Plaintiff’s Statement of Disputed Facts in

13

Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or,

14

in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment;

15



Defendant Genentech, Inc.’s Objections to Evidence Submitted in Support of

16

Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the

17

Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment; and

18



Exhibit B to the Supplemental Declaration of Julie A. Totten in Support of Defendant

19

Genentech, Inc.’s Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the

20

Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment.

21

The Clerk shall file under seal the documents that Genentech lodged with its Request.

22

Access to the sealed documents shall be limited to attorneys of record, parties, and Court

23

personnel.

24
25
26

Within seven (7) days of entry of this Order, Genentech shall file on the public docket
versions of the documents specified above with Genentech’s proposed redactions applied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28
4128-2584-9625

-1-

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
GENENTECH’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00822-JAM-AC

1
Dated: 1/2/2019.
2

/s/ John A. Mendez

3

Honorable John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4128-2584-9625

-2-

PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
GENENTECH’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
CASE NO. 2:17-CV-00822-JAM-AC