Maroney v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 26

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/10/18. that plaintiff as now filed a consent election form (see Doc. 21 ) as well as a dispositive motion (see Doc. 25 ). The Orders to Show Cause are, therefore, DISCHARGED. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TASHAYHA M. GILMER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:17-CV-0845-CMK

vs.

ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,

15
Defendant.
16
/
17
18

Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under

19

42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security.

20

As of January 17, 20178, plaintiff had not informed the court regarding consent to

21

Magistrate Judge jurisdiction or filed a dispositive motion and the court ordered plaintiff to show

22

cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with

23

court rules and orders (see Docs. 16 and 19). A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff as now

24

///

25

///

26

///
1

1

filed a consent election form (see Doc. 21) as well as a dispositive motion (see Doc. 25). The

2

orders to show cause are, therefore, discharged.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6
7

DATED: May 10, 2018
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2