Coleman v. Virga et al

Filing 107

ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/17/2023 ADOPTING in FULL 103 Findings and Recommendations. GRANTING 80 Motion for Summary Judgment. DENYING 84 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment, and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close tis case. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

Download PDF
Case 2:17-cv-00851-KJM-KJN Document 107 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT COLEMAN, 12 No. 2:17-cv-0851 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 T. VIRGA, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 5, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 20 21 served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Case 2:17-cv-00851-KJM-KJN Document 107 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2022, are adopted in full; 3 2. Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 84) is denied; 4 3. Defendants’ summary judgment motion (ECF No. 80) is granted; and 5 4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. 6 DATED: January 17, 2023. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?