Coleman v. Virga et al
Filing
16
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/26/2018 ORDERING Clerk of Court to assign a district judge to this action and RECOMMENDING defendants CDCR, Jordan, Morris, Papikian, Barrena, Soto, Moyle, Estrada, Doshna, Kernan and Avila be dismissed. Assigned and referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT COLEMAN,
12
No. 2: 17-cv-0851 KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
T. VIRGA, et al.,
15
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The undersigned has separately issued an order screening the first amended
19
complaint. (ECF No. 13.) The undersigned found that plaintiff stated potentially colorable
20
claims against defendants Hinrich, Lynch, Virga, Haring, Wright, Curren and Walcott. The
21
undersigned ordered service of these defendants.
The undersigned also found that plaintiff failed to state potentially colorable claims
22
23
against defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), Jordan,
24
Morris, Papikian, Barrena, Soto, Moyle, Estrada, Doshna, Kernan and Avila. For the reasons
25
stated in that order, the undersigned recommends that these defendants be dismissed.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign a district
26
27
judge to this action; and
28
////
1
1
2
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendants CDCR, Jordan, Morris, Papikian,
Barrena, Soto, Moyle, Estrada, Doshna, Kernan and Avila be dismissed.
3
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
4
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
5
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
6
with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
7
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that
8
failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District
9
Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
10
Dated: January 26, 2018
11
12
13
14
Cole851.56
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?