Watts v. Department of Corrections et al
Filing
38
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/27/19 ADOPTING 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full; Plaintiff's retaliation claim against defendants Saint Louis, Velasquez, and Medina be dismissed without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
KARLIN WATTS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:17-cv-0852 JAM DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et
al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On November 16, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff has
23
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2018, are adopted in full; and
28
1
1
2
2. Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against defendants Saint Louis, Velasquez, and Medina be
dismissed without prejudice.
3
4
5
6
DATED: March 27, 2019
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?